Aircraft Lighting Automation by Flight Phase Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Pilot workload is increased due to manual management of aircraft lights during critical and non-critical phases of flight, leading to fatigue and distraction, and existing systems do not effectively automate lighting based on contextual information such as flight phase.

Innovation Solution

An aircraft lighting system that includes a lighting control module with avionics interfaces, mobile devices, and remote backend server, which automates lighting activation and deactivation based on flight phases, avionics data, and contextual information, using a central processing unit, inertial measurement unit, and GPS for orientation and position, and integrates with mobile devices and 3rd party integrations for weather data.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If pilots manually manage aircraft lights during flight phases, then lighting control is simple and direct, but pilot workload increases and fatigue accumulates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelighting controlVSAvoidpilot workload
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The lighting system automatically detects flight phase through sensors (accelerometer, GPS, barometer) and autonomously controls lighting activation/deactivation without requiring pilot intervention. The system serves itself by monitoring its own operational context and making control decisions independently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system pre-configures lighting sequences for different flight phases (taxi, takeoff, cruise, landing, shutdown) and automatically executes the appropriate sequence when flight conditions are detected, eliminating the need for pilots to manually manage each lighting event during critical phases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If pilots manually switch lights during critical phases of flight, then lighting activation is immediate, but pilot distraction increases and safety decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflight safetyVSAvoidlighting management
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The lighting control system operates autonomously by detecting flight phase through integrated sensors and automatically managing lighting activation/deactivation. This removes lighting management from the pilot's task list during critical phases, reducing distraction and improving safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors flight parameters (acceleration, position, altitude) through sensors and uses this feedback to determine current flight phase, ensuring lighting control decisions are always synchronized with actual aircraft operations without requiring pilot input.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If an automated lighting system is implemented, then pilot workload is reduced, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepilot workloadVSAvoidlighting system
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The lighting control module serves multiple functions: it detects flight phase through sensor integration, determines appropriate lighting sequences, controls multiple aircraft lights, and provides user interface capabilities through mobile devices. This consolidation of multiple functions into a single system justifies the complexity by delivering comprehensive automation benefits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses mobile electronic devices as an intermediary between the pilot and the lighting control module, allowing pilots to monitor and control lighting through familiar devices without adding physical complexity to the aircraft's control interface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Loss of time

If lighting is automated based on flight phase, then lighting timing is accurate, but automation extent increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelighting activation timeVSAvoidlighting control
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically detects flight phase transitions through sensor data and immediately executes the corresponding lighting sequence without requiring pilot interpretation or manual activation, achieving precise timing aligned with actual flight events.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system pre-programs lighting sequences for each flight phase and automatically retrieves and executes the appropriate sequence when flight conditions are detected, ensuring lighting activation occurs at the precise moment needed without manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentEP4103472B1Aircraft lighting system and method
Publication Date: 2026.03.18 WHELEN AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGIES
  • EP4103472B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4103472B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4103472B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A system for controlling lighting on an aircraft, the system comprising a number of sensors, a number of aircraft lights, and a processor. The sensors are configured to detect states of the aircraft. The processor is communicatively coupled with the aircraft lights and is configured to determine that a condition is met according to one of the states detected by one of the plurality of sensors and automatically turn on one of the plurality of aircraft lights when the condition is met.