Aircraft Protective Liner Molding for Quasi-Continuous Production

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for manufacturing protective liners for aircraft structural profile parts are inefficient and lack a cost-effective, automated process for producing high-quality protective liners.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus involving the use of base molds with molding features, a sealant application mechanism, and a curing apparatus to create a continuous molding feature, applying and curing uncured sealant to form a protective liner, which is then attached to the structural profile part, allowing for a quasi-continuous, automated process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional manual methods are used to manufacture protective liners, then flexibility and adaptability are maintained, but productivity is low and manufacturing cost is high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction volumeVSAvoidmanufacturing process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The manufacturing process is segmented into distinct modular steps: preparing base molds with molding features, arranging them in sequences, applying uncured sealant, curing the sealant, and releasing the protective liner. Each step can be independently optimized and automated, enabling high-volume production while maintaining process clarity and control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The process enables continuous production by arranging base molds in sequences where uncured sealant is applied continuously along the continuous molding feature, followed by continuous curing. This eliminates idle time between production cycles and maximizes productivity while the modular nature keeps device complexity manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

2Productivity

If automated processes are introduced to increase productivity, then production volume increases, but manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction volumeVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The base molds serve multiple functions: they provide the molding feature for the protective liner, form part of the continuous molding feature when arranged in sequences, and can be reused repeatedly after release. This multi-functionality reduces the need for specialized equipment for each production step, lowering overall manufacturing cost while maintaining high productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The uncured sealant is applied and then cured in-place within the base mold arrangement, eliminating the need for separate transfer operations or additional handling equipment. The process uses the materials' own properties (flow and curing characteristics) to achieve the manufacturing objective, reducing equipment requirements and cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Manufacturing precision

If conventional sealant application methods are used, then process simplicity is maintained, but manufacturing precision and quality are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotective liner qualityVSAvoidmolding feature complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple base molds are arranged in sequences such that their molding features are at the same level and form a continuous molding feature. This equipotential arrangement ensures uniform sealant application and consistent curing conditions along the entire length, improving manufacturing precision while the modular base mold design keeps individual components simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #12Equipotentiality

4Productivity

If protective liners are manufactured for each component individually, then adaptability is maintained, but productivity is low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction volumeVSAvoidcustomization capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The production system is segmented into modular base molds that can be arranged in different sequences and configurations. Each base mold can be designed with specific molding features for different component types, allowing customization while maintaining high productivity through continuous production of standardized units.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The base mold system is designed to be universal, where the same type of base mold can be used for different protective liner configurations by changing the arrangement sequence or molding feature configuration. This enables production of multiple product variants from the same equipment, maintaining adaptability while achieving high-volume production.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables high-volume, cost-effective production of protective liners with improved quality by utilizing self-curing sealants in a partially automated process, enhancing the protection of aircraft structural components.

Implementation Method 1

applying an uncured wet sealant to the continuous molding feature; curing the wet sealant into a cured sealant member within the base mold

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCuring: Phase Change

Data Source

PatentEP4458544B1A method and apparatus for manufacturing protective liners for structural profile parts of aircraft
Publication Date: 2025.12.10 AIRBUS OPERATIONS GMBH
  • EP4458544B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4458544B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4458544B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

In order to improve the manufacture of protected structural profile parts (50), particularly for mass-fabrication for a fuselage (52) of an aircraft, a quasicontinuous process is proposed. A plurality of base molds (10) are prepared by forming molding features (12) that matche a portion to be protected of the structural profile part (14). The base molds (10) are arranged such that their molding features (12) cooperatively form a continuous molding feature (16). A sealant applicator (26) is used to apply an uncured wet sealant (28) to the groove, wherein the sealant applicator (26) also acts as a complementary mold member (30) in order to give the uncured wet sealant (28) the desired shape. The wet sealant is cured and forms a cured sealant member (38), which is released from the base mold (10) and fixed to the structural profile part (14) as a protective liner (48), thereby generating the desired protected structural profile part (50).