Aircraft Maintenance Prediction Using Multi-Leg Flight Data

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current aircraft maintenance systems fail to provide sufficiently early warnings of impending undesired conditions, often limiting maintenance crews' ability to prepare and respond proactively, as they focus on real-time data and do not leverage historical records for predictive insights.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus that store higher-level and lower-level condition information from multiple flight legs to generate predicted maintenance event messages, using a machine learning algorithm to extract feature vectors and provide maintenance personnel with timely alerts for proactive maintenance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If real-time monitoring data is used for maintenance prediction, then the system can detect faults quickly, but the prediction lead time is insufficient for proactive maintenance planning

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault detection speedVSAvoidmaintenance preparation time
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis by training machine learning models on historical flight data and condition information before actual maintenance events occur. This pre-processing of data and model training enables faster real-time predictions with extended lead time, allowing maintenance crews to prepare in advance rather than reacting to immediate faults

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from analyzing only real-time operational data to incorporating multiple dimensions including historical condition information, maintenance records, and flight parameters across multiple flight legs. This multi-dimensional approach enables the system to identify patterns that predict failures days in advance, extending the prediction horizon while maintaining detection accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Ease of operation

If only real-time data is analyzed, then the system remains simple to operate, but prediction accuracy and lead time are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem operation simplicityVSAvoidmaintenance event prediction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically processes and integrates multiple data sources including condition information from various aircraft systems, historical maintenance records, and flight parameters. The machine learning models self-train on this comprehensive data, performing feature extraction and pattern recognition without requiring manual intervention, thus maintaining ease of operation while achieving high prediction accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system is designed to handle multiple types of data (condition information, maintenance records, flight parameters) and perform multiple functions (data integration, feature extraction, predictive analysis, and maintenance planning support) through a unified machine learning framework. This multi-functional approach enables accurate predictions without increasing operational complexity for users

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Loss of time

If comprehensive historical data from multiple flight legs is stored and analyzed, then prediction lead time and accuracy improve, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaintenance warning lead timeVSAvoiddata storage and processing system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the most relevant features from comprehensive historical data using machine learning algorithms. Instead of storing and processing all raw data, the system identifies and extracts key condition parameters, maintenance patterns, and flight characteristics that are most predictive of future failures. This feature extraction reduces data complexity while maintaining prediction accuracy and extending lead time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS10650614B2Aircraft maintenance event prediction using higher-level and lower-level system information
Publication Date: 2020.05.12 THE BOEING CO
  • US10650614B2 patent drawing
  • US10650614B2 patent drawing
  • US10650614B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and apparatus for maintaining an aircraft. Real-time event information indicating faults in systems on the aircraft and aircraft condition monitoring system data indicating conditions of the systems on the aircraft are stored during a plurality of legs of flights of the aircraft. A feature table comprising the real-time event information and the aircraft condition monitoring system data is built. Feature vectors are extracted from the feature table. A machine learning algorithm is applied to the extracted feature vectors to generate a predicted maintenance event message that identifies a predicted maintenance event. The predicted maintenance event message is used to perform a maintenance operation on the aircraft.