Aircraft Manufacturing Controller for Downstream Delay Mitigation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current task management systems in aircraft manufacturing are unable to effectively identify and mitigate delays that affect downstream events, leading to potential delays in milestones such as delivery, certification, and first flight, due to lack of real-time monitoring and analysis of assembly task dependencies.

Innovation Solution

A manufacturing controller with an assembly task network and analyzer that monitors task data in real-time, calculates probabilities of downstream delays, and modifies incomplete tasks to reduce delays by identifying critical milestones at risk, allowing for resource allocation to prevent missed deadlines.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If real-time monitoring and analysis of assembly task dependencies is implemented, then downstream delays can be identified and mitigated, but system complexity and computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemilestone completion reliabilityVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The assembly task network is segmented into hierarchical levels (assembly tasks, components, milestones) allowing independent analysis and monitoring at each level. This segmentation enables the system to manage complexity by breaking down the overall monitoring problem into smaller, manageable sub-problems while maintaining comprehensive oversight of downstream delays.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary analysis by calculating probabilities of downstream delays before they actually occur. By proactively identifying tasks that are likely to cause delays and notifying users in advance, the system enables preventive actions to be taken, improving milestone completion reliability without requiring complex real-time intervention mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If probability calculations for downstream delays are performed for all assembly tasks, then accurate prediction of milestone delays is achieved, but computational time and processing resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedelay probability prediction accuracyVSAvoidcomputational processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs probability calculations selectively rather than uniformly for all tasks. Full probability calculations are performed for tasks identified as potentially impacting milestones, while less critical tasks receive simplified monitoring. This partial action approach maintains sufficient prediction accuracy for decision-making while significantly reducing overall computational burden and processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from task completion status and dependency relationships to dynamically adjust which tasks require detailed probability calculations. As tasks are completed or their status changes, the system re-evaluates which downstream tasks need analysis, optimizing computational resources based on current system state rather than performing static calculations on all tasks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Loss of time

If comprehensive dependency tracking between assembly tasks is implemented, then downstream delay risks are identified earlier, but data collection and processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedelay detection timeVSAvoiddata processing volume
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and focuses on critical dependency relationships rather than tracking all possible task interactions. By identifying and monitoring only those dependencies that have significant impact on milestone completion, the system reduces data processing volume while maintaining early detection capability for meaningful delays. Non-critical dependencies are excluded from intensive monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Different levels of dependency tracking are applied to different parts of the assembly task network based on their importance. Critical paths and tasks with high impact on milestones receive comprehensive dependency tracking and monitoring, while less critical tasks use simplified tracking. This local quality approach optimizes the balance between early delay detection and data processing requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS10317870B1Manufacturing controller for aircraft
Publication Date: 2019.06.11 THE BOEING CO
  • US10317870B1 patent drawing
  • US10317870B1 patent drawing
  • US10317870B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and apparatus for monitoring manufacturing of a product. An assembly task network for assembly tasks for assembling is searched by a computer system. The assembly task network defines dependencies between the assembly tasks. A probability of a group of downstream delays as a function of a state of assembly of components for the product being manufactured is calculated using a state of the assembly tasks, enabling modifying incomplete assembly tasks for the product that reduce the group of downstream delays.