Aircraft Electrical Network Cells for Resilient Contactor Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing centralized systems for controlling aircraft electrical networks are not resilient to failures, require proximity of actuation and control members, and are limited by data flow capacity, making them inflexible and difficult to modify.

Innovation Solution

A decentralised system with multiple independent cells, each containing microcontrollers to control contactors, interconnected through digital and physical networks, allowing for rapid information exchange and redundancy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a centralized control system is used, then control functions can be consolidated in one location, but the system becomes non-resilient to failures and difficult to modify

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system architectureVSAvoidsystem resilience
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is divided into multiple independent control cells distributed throughout the electrical network. Each cell can autonomously control its local contactors and make decisions independently. This segmentation eliminates the single point of failure in centralized systems, as the failure of one control cell does not affect the operation of other cells, thereby improving system resilience while maintaining manageable complexity through modular design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Ease of operation

If control members are placed in proximity to the control card, then control signals can be transmitted easily, but the system requires specific organization and is difficult to modify

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol signal transmissionVSAvoidarchitecture flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs dynamic reconfiguration capabilities where control cells can be added, removed, or relocated without requiring changes to the fundamental system architecture. Each control cell is designed to be independently configurable and can adapt its operation based on the presence and state of other cells, enabling flexible modification of the system layout while maintaining ease of control signal transmission through standardized communication protocols

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If all information is centralized on one or more cards, then redundancy solutions can be provided, but the data flow is limited by microcontroller capacity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveredundancy capabilityVSAvoiddata flow capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

Information processing is segmented and distributed across multiple control cells, each with its own microcontroller. Each cell processes and stores information locally relevant to its operation, eliminating the bottleneck of a single central microcontroller. Redundancy is achieved through the distribution of information across multiple cells rather than duplication on single cards, thereby increasing both data flow capacity and reliability without being constrained by individual microcontroller capacities

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20250273956A1Decentralised system for controlling an electrical network
Publication Date: 2025.08.28 SAFRAN ELECTRICAL & POWER
  • US20250273956A1 patent drawing
  • US20250273956A1 patent drawing
  • US20250273956A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A decentralised system for controlling an electrical network of an aircraft, the system including a plurality of distinct cells, each cell including a plurality of electrical contactors and each cell being connected to an electrical supply. Each cell has at least one microcontroller for controlling at least one contactor.