Electric Aircraft Power Bus Fault Isolation With Shared Battery Packs

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Electric aircraft power distribution systems face challenges in balancing safety, weight, and efficiency, as conventional systems with redundancies increase inefficiencies and weight, while ensuring no single point of failure.

Innovation Solution

A power distribution system for electric aircraft that includes a first battery pack connected to a load and a second battery pack via a common bus, with faster-acting and slower-acting electrical disconnection devices to protect against overcurrent faults, allowing for load sharing and fault tolerance without redundant buses or diodes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional power distribution systems employ multiple battery packs and redundancies to ensure no single point of failure, then safety and reliability are improved, but weight and system inefficiency increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidweight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The power distribution system is segmented into multiple independent battery packs, each capable of operating autonomously. Each battery pack has its own protection circuitry and can independently power critical loads, eliminating the need for heavy redundant systems while maintaining safety through modular independence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the operational parameters by allowing battery packs to dynamically share load based on their state of charge and capacity. This load sharing mechanism enables lighter individual battery packs while maintaining overall system reliability through coordinated operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If conventional power distribution systems employ multiple battery packs and redundancies to ensure no single point of failure, then safety and reliability are improved, but system efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidefficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The power distribution system implements dynamic load sharing where battery packs automatically adjust their power output based on real-time conditions. This dynamic operation eliminates the inefficiencies of static redundant systems while maintaining reliability through adaptive coordination between battery packs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

Each battery pack is designed with multi-functionality, serving both as a primary power source and as a backup for other packs. This universal design eliminates the need for dedicated redundant systems, improving efficiency while maintaining safety through versatile battery pack operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If electrical disconnection devices are positioned between battery packs and loads for protection, then fault tolerance is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault toleranceVSAvoidcomplexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The protection function is extracted from complex centralized control systems and embedded directly into simple electrical disconnection devices positioned at each battery pack outlet. This extraction simplifies the overall system architecture while maintaining fault tolerance through distributed, fail-safe protection mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS12162614B2Systems and methods for power distribution in electric aircraft
Publication Date: 2024.12.10 ARCHER AVIATION INC
  • US12162614B2 patent drawing
  • US12162614B2 patent drawing
  • US12162614B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A electric aircraft power distribution system includes a first battery pack connected to at least a first load and to a common bus that connects the first battery pack in parallel to at least a second battery pack; a first electrical component electrically connected between the first battery pack and the first load and configured to disconnect the first load from the first battery pack in response to current above a first threshold current, wherein the first electrical component has a first disconnection time at the first threshold current; and a second electrical component electrically connected between the first battery pack and the common bus and configured to disconnect the first battery pack from the common bus in response to current above a second threshold current, wherein the second electrical component has a second disconnection time at the second threshold current that is higher than the first disconnection time.