Aircraft Power Controller Status Indicators for Startup Diagnostics

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Aircraft electronics systems face inconsistencies in power management during startup and shutdown, particularly in ensuring persistent memory and diagnosing operability, with complex interactions between redundant boxes and uncertain power states.

Innovation Solution

A power system with a controller that monitors power sources, provides status indicators to manage efficient startup and shutdown processes, including power warning signals for impending interruptions, cold start signals for reduced diagnostics, and partner alive signals for synchronization, ensuring controlled power-up and power-down of electronics boxes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a cold start routine is performed to check operability of electronics boxes, then reliability is improved, but startup time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperability checkVSAvoidstartup time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The power controller performs preliminary actions by monitoring power sources and providing status indicators before the load needs to start up. By anticipating power interruptions and providing advance warning, the system can prepare for startup conditions, reducing the need for extensive cold start diagnostics when power is restored.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback through power system status indicators that provide information about power source conditions to the loads. This feedback mechanism allows loads to adjust their startup procedures based on the current power system state, enabling reduced diagnostics when conditions permit and full diagnostics only when necessary.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If power holdup circuitry is added to ensure persistent memory and function through power interrupts, then reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepersistent memoryVSAvoidpower holdup circuitry
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The power controller serves as an intermediary between power sources and loads, managing power distribution and providing status information. This mediator approach allows the system to achieve reliable power management and persistent memory functionality through coordinated control rather than adding complex holdup circuitry to each individual load.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The power controller performs multiple functions including monitoring power sources, providing status indicators, controlling power delivery, and managing startup/shutdown sequences. By consolidating these functions in a single controller rather than distributing complexity across multiple components, the system achieves reliability without proportionally increasing overall device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If redundant boxes share responsibility for system functionality, then reliability is improved, but synchronization complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveredundant boxesVSAvoidsynchronization operation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The power system status indicators provide feedback information about the state of redundant boxes and power sources. This shared information allows redundant boxes to synchronize their operations without complex direct communication between them, as the power controller provides a common reference state that all boxes can use to coordinate their activities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Reliability

If comprehensive startup diagnostics are performed, then reliability is improved, but productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnostic testsVSAvoidstartup speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the extent of diagnostic tests based on power system conditions. When the power controller indicates stable power conditions, loads can perform comprehensive diagnostics. When power interruptions are anticipated or conditions are unstable, loads can skip certain diagnostics and perform only essential checks, adapting the diagnostic depth to current system state.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of diagnostic thoroughness based on power system status. By monitoring power source stability and interruption history, the system adjusts whether full diagnostics or reduced diagnostics are performed, allowing the same hardware to achieve both high reliability when needed and fast startup when conditions permit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10374426B2Enhanced power signaling system
Publication Date: 2019.08.06 HAMILTON SUNDSTRAND CORP
  • US10374426B2 patent drawing
  • US10374426B2 patent drawing
  • US10374426B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A power system includes one or more loads operable responsive to electrical power. The power system also includes a power controller operable to monitor one or more power sources, selectively provide electrical power from the one or more power sources to the one or more loads, and provide one or more power system status indicators to the one or more loads. The one or more power system status indicators trigger a modification to a startup process or trigger a shutdown process of the one or more loads.