Aircraft Rollover Detection Using Dynamic Critical Roll Angles

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing aircraft systems lack effective methods to detect and prevent dynamic and static rollover conditions, particularly in rotary-wing aerial vehicles like helicopters, which can lead to potential damage and safety hazards due to improper pilot response.

Innovation Solution

A system and method utilizing onboard sensors and controllers to dynamically determine roll angles, angular rates, and critical rollover angles, generating alerts and potentially adjusting aircraft operations to prevent rollover through sensors measuring landing gear heights and processing data from various sources to predict and mitigate rollover risks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If no rollover detection system is implemented, then the aircraft structure remains simple and operation is straightforward, but the safety against dynamic and static rollover conditions is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety against rolloverVSAvoidaircraft system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary detection of rollover conditions by continuously monitoring roll angle and angular rate before actual rollover occurs. The controller calculates critical rollover angles and compares them with current aircraft state, enabling early warning and preventive action to avoid the harmful rollover event.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by continuously measuring roll angle and angular rate, comparing these values against critical thresholds, and adjusting aircraft operations accordingly. The controller receives real-time data from sensors, processes it to determine rollover risk, and provides corrective guidance to the pilot or automated control system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Loss of time

If manual monitoring of roll conditions is used, then system complexity is low, but response time to critical rollover conditions is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse time to rollover conditionVSAvoidautomated detection capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The aircraft system performs self-monitoring of its own rollover risk by incorporating sensors and controllers that automatically detect and evaluate critical conditions. The system serves itself by continuously assessing its state without external intervention, enabling immediate detection and response to developing rollover situations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual mechanical monitoring with electronic sensor-based detection and automated control. Instead of relying on pilot observation and manual assessment, the system uses electronic sensors to measure roll angle and angular rate, processes this data automatically, and provides instant electronic warning or corrective control input.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Measurement precision

If conservative roll angle thresholds are used, then false alerts are reduced, but the system becomes less sensitive to early rollover indicators

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection sensitivityVSAvoidfalse alert rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses dynamic thresholding where the critical rollover angle threshold is not fixed but adapts based on real-time aircraft conditions such as landing gear configuration, flight phase, and operational mode. This allows the system to maintain high detection sensitivity across varying conditions while reducing false alerts by adjusting thresholds to match actual aircraft risk profiles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of critical rollover angle threshold dynamically based on aircraft state. By modifying this parameter according to landing gear position, flight phase, and other operational factors, the system achieves both high sensitivity for early detection and low false alert rate, as the threshold adapts to the specific risk context of each operational moment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20260029250A1Systems and methods for detecting and warning of aircraft rollover conditions
Publication Date: 2026.01.29 HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
  • US20260029250A1 patent drawing
  • US20260029250A1 patent drawing
  • US20260029250A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are provided for detecting and warning of aircraft rollover conditions. The systems include one or more sensors onboard the aircraft and a controller onboard the aircraft that is in operable communication with the one or more sensors. The controller is configured to, by one or more processors: receive input data from the one or more sensors and, optionally, one or more other sources, process the input data to dynamically determine a roll angle of the aircraft, an angular roll rate of the aircraft, and a critical rollover angle of the aircraft, determine whether current or potential static or dynamic rollover conditions of the aircraft exist based, at least in part, on the roll angle, the angular roll rate, and the critical rollover angle, and generate an alert in response to determining that the current or potential static or dynamic rollover conditions exist.