Aircraft Sensor Assembly With Crumple Zone for Remote Mounting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Ground-based, non-integrated collision avoidance systems for aircraft face challenges in securing portable sensors to remote areas of large aircraft that are outside the reach of a normal person and ensuring sensor functionality after accidental drops, particularly from the T-tail of large jets.

Innovation Solution

A sensor assembly comprising a sensor releasably secured to a frame sub-assembly, which includes a top panel, bottom panel, and adjustable jaws, allowing easy attachment to remote aircraft areas and ensuring operational integrity even after drops, using ultrasonic radio frequency, RADAR, or LIDAR for distance monitoring, with electrochemical cells for power, and a crumple zone for protection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If portable sensors are placed on remote areas of large aircraft (e.g., T-tail), then collision avoidance coverage is improved, but sensor security and operational reliability deteriorate due to inaccessibility and drop damage risks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensor operational reliabilityVSAvoidsensor attachment accessibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The sensor assembly is divided into separable components: a protective cradle structure and the sensor itself. The cradle can be independently attached to the aircraft surface, providing a stable platform that is easier to reach than the remote T-tail area, while the sensor can be securely mounted within the cradle structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A crumple zone or cushioning structure is incorporated into the sensor assembly design. This protective element is positioned to absorb impact forces before they reach the sensor, ensuring that even if the assembly is dropped from great heights, the sensor remains functional and operational.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

2Reliability

If sensors are secured to remote aircraft areas, then collision detection coverage is improved, but sensor protection against drop damage deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision detection capabilityVSAvoiddrop damage risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The sensor assembly incorporates a crumple zone designed to deform in a controlled manner during impact events. This energy-absorbing structure is positioned between the sensor and the external environment, dissipating impact forces before they can damage the sensor components, thereby maintaining operational reliability even after drops.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Solution Approach 2:

The protective cradle structure utilizes composite materials that combine high strength with energy-absorbing characteristics. These materials provide both structural integrity for mounting the sensor in remote locations and shock absorption capability to protect against drop damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Reliability

If integrated collision avoidance systems are installed during manufacturing, then system reliability is improved, but cost and aircraft grounding requirements worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem reliabilityVSAvoidinstallation cost and complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The collision avoidance system is segmented into modular, portable sensor assemblies that can be independently installed and removed. This allows the system to be installed after manufacturing without requiring aircraft disassembly or FAA certification, reducing installation costs while maintaining reliability through standardized mounting procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The portable sensor assemblies are designed as cost-effective, replaceable units. If a sensor is damaged or malfunctions, it can be quickly replaced without requiring expensive system-wide repairs or aircraft grounding, making the overall system more cost-effective despite being non-integrated.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables quick and secure attachment of sensors to remote aircraft areas and maintains functionality despite accidental drops, preventing collisions by monitoring distances effectively.

Implementation Method 1

using ultrasonic radio frequency, RADAR, or LIDAR for distance monitoring

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectUltrasonic: Ultrasound

Implementation Method 2

using ultrasonic radio frequency, RADAR, or LIDAR for distance monitoring

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRADAR: Radar

Implementation Method 3

using ultrasonic radio frequency, RADAR, or LIDAR for distance monitoring

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLIDAR: LIDAR

Data Source

PatentUS20260038377A1Sensor Assembly for Use in Association with Aircraft Collision Avoidance System and Method of Using the Same
Publication Date: 2026.02.05 WINGGUARD LLC
  • US20260038377A1 patent drawing
  • US20260038377A1 patent drawing
  • US20260038377A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A sensor assembly for use in association with non-integrated, ground-based collision avoidance systems for aircraft, including (a) a sensor; and (b) a frame sub-assembly, wherein the sensor is releasably securable to the frame sub-assembly.