Aircraft Monitoring Software Simulation for Collision Avoidance Validation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Demonstrating the reliability of aircraft collision avoidance systems in various environmental conditions is challenging due to the high cost and unpredictability of flight tests, making it difficult to meet rigorous safety standards set by certification authorities.

Innovation Solution

A simulation system that generates stochastic scenarios to test aircraft monitoring systems, allowing for the validation of detection and avoidance capabilities through iterative simulation testing, using machine learning algorithms to adapt to varying conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If flight tests are used to validate collision avoidance systems, then reliability demonstration is achieved, but cost and time consumption increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability demonstrationVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates virtual copies of flight scenarios through simulation environments that replicate real-world collision avoidance conditions. These simulated flight tests allow comprehensive validation of detection and avoidance systems without requiring actual aircraft deployment, thereby demonstrating reliability while eliminating the time and resource costs of physical flight testing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The simulation system performs preliminary validation of collision avoidance software before actual flight tests. By pre-testing various collision scenarios, environmental conditions, and system responses in a virtual environment, the system identifies and resolves issues beforehand, reducing the need for extensive iterative flight testing and accelerating the overall validation process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If flight tests are used to validate collision avoidance systems, then reliability demonstration is achieved, but cost increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability demonstrationVSAvoidcost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces expensive physical flight tests with cost-effective virtual simulations. By copying real flight conditions, sensor data, and collision scenarios into a simulated environment, the system achieves the same validation objectives without the substantial costs associated with aircraft operations, personnel, and facility requirements for actual flight testing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The simulation system uses inexpensive virtual resources instead of expensive physical assets. Each simulation run consumes minimal computational resources compared to the high cost of actual flight tests, allowing numerous iterative tests to be performed at a fraction of the cost, thereby demonstrating reliability economically.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Reliability

If comprehensive scenario testing is performed, then validation coverage is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalidation coverageVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the comprehensive validation process into modular simulation components. The simulation system divides complex flight scenarios into discrete test cases, each validating specific aspects of collision avoidance functionality. This modular approach enables thorough validation coverage while managing system complexity through organized, reusable test modules and standardized simulation protocols.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS12589889B2Simulation architecture for safety testing of aircraft monitoring software
Publication Date: 2026.03.31 A3 BY AIRBUS LLC
  • US12589889B2 patent drawing
  • US12589889B2 patent drawing
  • US12589889B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A simulation testing architecture can be applied to an aircraft monitoring system for an aircraft that includes complex algorithms (such as machine learning algorithms) for sensing objects around the aircraft and controlling the aircraft to avoid such objects. A reference scenario is selected from a plurality of stored scenarios based on a desired set of aircraft safety standards. A stochastic process is applied to generate a large number of conditional variations within a simulated environment, varying weather, objects in the airspace, points of failure, and the like to provide a representative sample of possible aircraft missions and encounters within the selected reference scenario. Synthetic environmental inputs are fed into the aircraft monitoring system software, and the resultant actions of the software are logged. These logs can be used to generate metrics on an encounter-level basis, a scenario-level basis, or across a population of scenarios.