Aircraft Stringers with CFRP-Reinforced Flanges for Impact and Buckling
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing aircraft stringers face issues with impact strength, crippling strength, buckling strength, thermal cracking, and wrinkle formation due to their size, shape, and configuration, which affect their structural integrity and performance.
Innovation Solution
The implementation of aircraft stringers with CFRP material reinforced flanges, featuring specific ply drop ratios and stagger distances in the composite blanks, enhances the structural integrity by increasing impact and buckling strength while minimizing delamination and wrinkle formation.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Strength
If the stringer uses conventional composite structure without CFRP reinforcement, then the manufacturing process is simpler, but the impact strength and buckling strength are insufficient
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies composite materials by combining CFRP (carbon fiber reinforced plastic) reinforcement segments with conventional composite stiffening segments. The CFRP flanges are integrated with the stiffening segments to create a hybrid composite structure that enhances impact strength and buckling resistance while maintaining the benefits of composite material construction throughout the stringer assembly.
2Reliability
If the stringer uses conventional composite structure without optimized ply drop ratios, then the manufacturing process is simpler, but thermal cracking and wrinkle formation occur
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies parameter changes by optimizing the ply drop ratio to specific ranges (chordwise: 3-30, spanwise: 120-300). These controlled parameter specifications for ply termination stagger distances prevent thermal cracking and wrinkle formation during curing and operation, while the staggered ply drop design maintains manufacturing feasibility through defined geometric constraints.
3Strength
If the stringer flange is not reinforced with CFRP, then the manufacturing cost and complexity are lower, but the crippling strength and buckling strength are reduced
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies segmentation by dividing the stringer into distinct functional segments: CFRP reinforcement segments for the flanges and conventional composite stiffening segments for the web and other areas. This segmented approach allows targeted reinforcement where buckling strength is critical (at the flanges) while maintaining simpler construction in other regions, optimizing the strength-to-complexity ratio.
4Stability of the object's composition
If the ply stagger distances are not controlled within specified ratios, then the manufacturing process is more flexible, but delamination and structural integrity issues occur
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies parameter changes by establishing specific ratio ranges for ply drop configuration (chordwise ratio: 3-30, spanwise ratio: 120-300). These parameter specifications control the stagger distances between ply terminations to prevent delamination and maintain structural integrity, while allowing manufacturing flexibility within the defined ratio boundaries rather than requiring exact fixed distances.
Data Source
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
AI summary
Aircraft stringers (300) having carbon fiber reinforced plastic (CFRP) material reinforced flanges are disclosed. An example stringer (300) to be coupled to a skin (302) of an aircraft comprises a flange (316). The flange (316) includes a first portion (326) of a first stiffening segment (304). The flange (316) further includes a first portion (348) of a second stiffening segment (306) coupled to the first portion (326) of the first stiffening segment (304). The flange (316) further includes a CFRP reinforcement segment (314) coupled to the first portion (326) of the first stiffening segment (304) and to the first portion (348) of the second stiffening segment (306). The CFRP reinforcement segment (314) strengthens the first portion of the first stiffening segment and the first portion of the second stiffening segment.