Aircraft Task Management With Smart Contracts for Real-Time Replanning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current aircraft manufacturing processes face inefficiencies due to rigidly planned tasks, manual labor-intensive reassessments, and challenges in maintaining accurate data integrity for FAA certification, especially when conditions change during production.

Innovation Solution

An integrated system utilizing blockchain-based distributed ledgers and smart contracts for manufacturing task work statements (MTWS) that include conditional logic for resource management and priority adjustments, enabling real-time optimization and autonomous execution of tasks while maintaining data integrity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If tasks are rigidly planned in advance with predefined sequences, then manufacturing precision and compliance are improved, but adaptability to changing conditions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask execution accuracyVSAvoidresponse to condition changes
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic task management by enabling real-time modification of task parameters, sequences, and resource allocations based on changing manufacturing conditions. The system transitions from static predefined MTWS to dynamically adjustable task definitions that can be modified without complete rework, allowing the manufacturing process to adapt while maintaining precision through controlled change management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system allows modification of task parameters such as sequences, resources, and dependencies in response to changing conditions. By enabling parameter changes rather than requiring complete task redefinition, the system maintains manufacturing precision while improving adaptability to disruptions like delayed parts or resource availability changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If manual reassessment and reworking of tasks is performed when conditions change, then adaptability is improved, but productivity and time efficiency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereassessment capabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service through automated reassessment capabilities where the manufacturing execution system automatically evaluates condition changes, determines their impact on task sequences and resources, and executes necessary modifications without requiring manual intervention from engineers or administrators. This maintains adaptability while preserving productivity by eliminating manual reassessment labor.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms that continuously monitor manufacturing conditions, resource availability, and task progress. When changes are detected, the system automatically processes feedback information to reassess and adjust task plans, enabling rapid adaptation without manual intervention and thus maintaining high productivity levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If extensive manual labor is used for task reassessment and data maintenance, then data accuracy for FAA certification is improved, but time consumption and productivity deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata accuracyVSAvoiddata maintenance time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical processes of data collection, verification, and maintenance with automated electronic systems. The manufacturing execution system automatically captures task data, verifies compliance requirements, and maintains accurate records for FAA certification without manual intervention, thereby ensuring data accuracy while dramatically reducing the time required for data maintenance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates and maintains digital copies of task data, resource allocations, and compliance information in structured formats that can be automatically verified and submitted for FAA certification. These digital copies replace manual documentation processes, ensuring accuracy through automated data capture while eliminating time-consuming manual data maintenance activities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

4Reliability

If comprehensive data tracking is implemented for FAA certification, then reliability and compliance are improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecertification complianceVSAvoiddata management system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a universal data management system that serves multiple functions: tracking task execution, monitoring resource allocation, verifying compliance requirements, and generating certification documentation. By consolidating these functions into a single integrated system rather than separate specialized systems, the patent maintains comprehensive data tracking for reliability while reducing overall system complexity through functional integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS11645594B2Real-time optimization of aircraft manufacturing task management
Publication Date: 2023.05.09 THE BOEING CO
  • US11645594B2 patent drawing
  • US11645594B2 patent drawing
  • US11645594B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In an example, a method is performed by a computing system that is one of a group of computing systems involved in facilitating a manufacturing of an aircraft. The method comprises generating a plurality of manufacturing task work statements (MTWSs), each MTWS being associated with a task involved in the manufacturing and comprising smart contract data and computer code. The method also comprises receiving system state information indicating (i) a schedule according to which the aircraft is to be manufactured, (ii) resources available for use in executing the MTWSs, and (iii) one or more aircraft certification requirements with which the tasks involved in the manufacturing of the aircraft are to comply. The method also comprises executing the MTWSs based on the system state information and storing, in a blockchain-based distributed ledger accessible by the group of computing systems, an end state result of the execution of each MTWS.