Robotic Aircraft Transfer Coordination in Dynamic Landing Areas

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems face challenges in efficiently and safely transferring aircraft within densely populated urban areas, particularly in managing traffic congestion and reducing downtime at aerial transport facilities, due to the complexity of coordinating robotic devices for ground transfer operations.

Innovation Solution

A computing system that utilizes robotic devices to transport aircraft within aerial transport facilities by determining optimal routes and command instructions based on facility data, including flight itineraries and current facility states, to efficiently move aircraft between landing pads, parking locations, and maintenance areas, while avoiding obstacles and dynamically adjusting to changing conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If robotic devices are used to transfer aircraft within aerial transport facilities, then operational efficiency and safety of aircraft transfers are improved, but device complexity and coordination difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiency of aircraft transfersVSAvoidcomplexity of coordinating robotic devices
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A central control system acts as an intermediary between multiple robotic devices, aircraft, and facility systems. This mediator coordinates transfer operations by receiving requests, determining optimal routing, assigning robotic devices to specific aircraft, and monitoring execution, thereby managing complexity while maintaining high operational efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts routing and device assignment based on real-time facility conditions, aircraft priorities, and robotic device availability. Routes and assignments are not fixed but adapt continuously to changing conditions, optimizing efficiency while distributing coordination workload across time rather than requiring simultaneous complex coordination

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If multiple robotic devices operate simultaneously in the landing area, then transfer speed and productivity increase, but traffic congestion and collision risks increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransfer speed of aircraftVSAvoidsafety of aircraft transfers
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The control system continuously receives feedback on the positions, speeds, and statuses of all robotic devices and aircraft in the landing area. This real-time feedback enables dynamic adjustment of routes and speeds, allowing multiple devices to operate simultaneously while maintaining safe separation and preventing collisions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

Routes for multiple robotic devices are planned and coordinated in advance before they enter the landing area. The system determines conflict-free paths and timing sequences beforehand, allowing simultaneous operations while pre-establishing safety measures to prevent congestion and collisions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Loss of time

If aircraft are transferred quickly through the facility, then downtime is reduced, but the complexity of route coordination and obstacle avoidance increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedowntime of aircraft at facilityVSAvoidcomplexity of route coordination
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system maintains continuous transfer operations by eliminating idle time between sequential operations. Robotic devices continuously move aircraft from one location to another without unnecessary stopping or waiting, and the control system continuously manages routing and coordination, thereby reducing overall downtime while distributing coordination complexity across continuous operations rather than discrete decision points

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS12157580B2Systems and methods for transferring aircraft
Publication Date: 2024.12.03 JOBY AERO INC
  • US12157580B2 patent drawing
  • US12157580B2 patent drawing
  • US12157580B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for transferring aircraft within a landing area of an aerial transport are provided. A system includes a plurality of robotic devices configured to move aircraft within the landing area. The system obtains facility data to dynamically determine accessible and prohibited areas of the landing area. The system determines a robotic device to transfer an aircraft based on map data representing the prohibited/accessible areas of the landing area and robotic data representing attributes of each robotic device. The system determines a number of routes for the selected robotic device to transfer the aircraft within the landing area while avoiding prohibited areas of the landing area. The system generates command instructions for the selected robotic device and provides the command instructions to the selected robotic device to travel in accordance with the number of routes.