Aircraft Tray Table Interlock Assembly

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing slide-out tray tables for aircraft lack intuitive interlock assemblies that prevent damage to the tray table and adjacent structures during movement, and current interlock assemblies are often heavy and complex.

Innovation Solution

An interlock assembly for aircraft tray tables that includes a first interlock movable from an unlocked to a locked position by rotating the table leaf from a stowed to a deployed position, and a second interlock movable from an unlocked to a locked position by rotating the table leaf into the deployed position, using a cam mechanism to translate rotation into linear motion, thereby limiting movement and preventing contact with adjacent structures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If known interlock assemblies are used to restrict linear movement of the base and rotation of the table leaf, then damage to the tray table and adjacent structure is prevented, but the interlock assemblies become relatively heavy and complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedamage preventionVSAvoidinterlock assembly complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The interlock assembly is divided into two separate interlocks: a first interlock that engages with the base to restrict linear movement, and a second interlock that engages with the table leaf to restrict rotation. This segmentation allows each interlock to be simpler and lighter while collectively providing comprehensive protection against damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If known interlock assemblies are used to restrict linear movement of the base and rotation of the table leaf, then damage to the tray table and adjacent structure is prevented, but the interlock assemblies become relatively heavy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedamage preventionVSAvoidinterlock assembly weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the interlock function into two separate, specialized interlocks rather than one complex heavy interlock, the overall weight is reduced while maintaining the reliability needed to prevent damage to the tray table and adjacent structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If known interlock assemblies are used to restrict linear movement of the base and rotation of the table leaf, then damage to the tray table and adjacent structure is prevented, but the interlock assemblies become relatively heavy and complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedamage preventionVSAvoiduser intuition
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The interlock assembly operates automatically based on the tray table's position and configuration. The first interlock engages/disengages automatically when the base moves between retracted and extended positions, and the second interlock engages/disengages automatically when the table leaf rotates between stowed and deployed positions. This self-service operation eliminates the need for user intervention and provides intuitive operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Reliability

If a single complex interlock assembly is used to restrict both linear movement and rotation, then damage prevention is achieved, but device complexity and weight increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedamage preventionVSAvoidinterlock assembly complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The interlock function is segmented into two independent interlocks: the first interlock handles linear movement restriction of the base, and the second interlock handles rotation restriction of the table leaf. This segmentation reduces overall device complexity compared to a single complex interlock assembly that would need to handle both functions simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each interlock is designed to perform its specific function (linear movement restriction or rotation restriction) across multiple operating conditions and positions of the tray table, providing multi-functionality within each simplified component rather than requiring a single complex interlock to handle all scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The interlock assembly enhances user intuition, reduces the likelihood of damage to the tray table and adjacent structures, and simplifies the design by reducing weight and complexity, while allowing for interchangeable components that lower maintenance costs.

Implementation Method 1

using a cam mechanism to translate rotation into linear motion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCam mechanism: Cam

Data Source

PatentUS11827360B2Slide-out tray table with interlock assembly
Publication Date: 2023.11.28 S & S NUMERICAL CONTROL INC
  • US11827360B2 patent drawing
  • US11827360B2 patent drawing
  • US11827360B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An interlock assembly for a tray table of an aircraft includes a first interlock configured to be moved from an unlocked position to a locked position by rotation of a table leaf of the tray table from a stowed position toward a deployed position of the table leaf. The first interlock is configured to be moved from the locked position of the first interlock to the unlocked position of the first interlock by rotation of the table leaf into the deployed position. The interlock assembly includes a second interlock configured to be moved from an unlocked position of the second interlock to a locked position of the second interlock by rotation of the table leaf into the deployed position.