Aircraft Usage Severity Indexing for Component Life Validation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing aircraft maintenance systems struggle with efficiently processing vast amounts of flight data to accurately assess the usage severity of critical components, leading to potential in-service failures and inadequate retirement life assignments.

Innovation Solution

A system and method to generate usage severity indices for aircraft components using engine torque, cruise guide indicator, and flight regime data, allowing for continuous monitoring and validation of usage assumptions to ensure sufficient retirement lives and prevent failures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional flight test methods are used to assess aircraft component usage severity, then measurement precision can be achieved, but device complexity and loss of time increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveusage severity assessment accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex mechanical flight test systems with an information-processing system that uses existing flight data (torque, power, duration) to calculate usage severity indices. This substitution of mechanical testing with computational analysis reduces device complexity while maintaining assessment accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a computational model that copies and analyzes flight data parameters to determine usage severity, eliminating the need for physical flight tests. This allows multiple assessments to be performed using data copies rather than requiring actual flight repetitions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Reliability

If traditional flight tests are conducted to validate usage assumptions, then reliability can be improved, but loss of time and productivity decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent retirement life validationVSAvoidvalidation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary calculations of usage severity indices during normal flight operations by continuously monitoring and processing flight data. This preliminary action accumulates validation information over time without requiring dedicated test flights, thus maintaining reliability while reducing time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously processes flight data to validate usage assumptions throughout the aircraft's operational life, rather than performing discrete time-consuming flight tests. This continuous validation maintains reliability while minimizing interruption to normal operations and reducing total validation time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Measurement precision

If comprehensive flight data is collected to assess usage severity, then measurement precision improves, but device complexity and loss of substance increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveusage data accuracyVSAvoiddata processing burden
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential flight parameters (torque, power, duration) needed for usage severity assessment from the complete flight data set. This extraction of critical information maintains measurement precision while reducing the data processing burden by eliminating unnecessary data collection and analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS12497182B2Methods and apparatus for generating usage severity indices
Publication Date: 2025.12.16 THE BOEING CO
  • US12497182B2 patent drawing
  • US12497182B2 patent drawing
  • US12497182B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and apparatus for generating usage severity indices are disclosed herein. An example apparatus includes interface circuitry, machine readable instructions, and programmable circuitry to at least one of instantiate or execute the machine readable instructions to determine a first usage severity index for a drive system of an aircraft based on engine torque data, determine a second usage severity index for a rotor system of the aircraft based on cruise guide indicator data, determine a third usage severity index for a pylon structure of the aircraft based on flight regime data, and generate a flight-based usage severity index for the aircraft using the first usage severity index, the second usage severity index, and the third usage severity index.