Aircraft Flight Path Control Using Weather Vortex Tailwinds

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current flight management systems face challenges in determining optimal flight paths that avoid weather vortices while utilizing vortex currents to minimize flight time and fuel consumption, often resulting in increased travel time and costs due to pilot judgment errors and inefficient navigation.

Innovation Solution

A controller system that receives input parameters such as starting and ending points, current aircraft speed, wind vortex strength, and position, and uses boundary value optimization techniques based on Zermelo's theorem and Hamiltonian mechanics to determine an optimal flight path and control variables, minimizing time and fuel consumption by strategically using wind currents.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the flight path avoids storm cells altogether, then the aircraft safety is improved, but the travel time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaircraft safetyVSAvoidtravel time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system converts the harmful vortex currents into beneficial tailwinds by calculating optimal flight paths that strategically position the aircraft to capture these currents. The boundary value optimization problem determines control variables that allow the aircraft to use vortex-induced winds to reduce travel time while maintaining safety margins from storm cells.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts flight path parameters including lateral offset distance from vortex center, altitude, and heading angle. By changing these parameters based on real-time vortex position and strength data, the system optimizes the balance between safety (maintaining adequate distance) and efficiency (capturing beneficial winds).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If the pilot uses judgment to determine a route to avoid storm cells, then the flight path flexibility is improved, but the accuracy of avoiding being blown off course deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflight path flexibilityVSAvoidflight path accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors aircraft position, vortex location, and wind conditions, then adjusts the flight path control variables in real-time. This closed-loop feedback ensures the aircraft maintains the optimal lateral offset from vortex center and captures tailwinds while compensating for deviations, thereby improving both flexibility and precision simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces pilot judgment with an automated boundary value optimization algorithm that calculates optimal flight paths. This substitution eliminates human error in judging vortex proximity and wind capture opportunities, providing precise control over flight path accuracy while maintaining adaptability through dynamic recalculation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Use of energy by moving object

If the aircraft flies too close to the eye of a vortex, then the opportunity to catch tailwinds is improved, but the exposure to strong side/cross winds increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel efficiencyVSAvoidcross wind impact
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a partial approach to vortex capture by maintaining an optimal lateral offset distance rather than flying directly through or immediately adjacent to the vortex center. This partial action allows the aircraft to capture beneficial tailwinds from the vortex periphery while avoiding the harmful strong cross winds near the center, achieving a balanced compromise between fuel efficiency and safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11353888B2System and method for determining optimal flight path around weather vortices
Publication Date: 2022.06.07 ROCKWELL COLLINS INC
  • US11353888B2 patent drawing
  • US11353888B2 patent drawing
  • US11353888B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for an aircraft includes a user interface device and a controller. The controller is configured to receive a present location of the aircraft, a present location of one or more wind vortices, a strength of the one or more wind vortices, and a desired ending point of the aircraft. The desired ending point of the aircraft is received from the user interface device. The controller is configured to define an optimization problem, and determine a solution to the optimization problem. The solution to the optimization problem includes a flight path and steering angle values to achieve the flight path. The flight path results in a minimum time to reach the desired ending point. The controller is configured to cause the user interface device to display a map including the flight path.