Aircraft Wind Compensation Control for Low-Speed Maneuvers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing aircraft systems lack precise control during low-speed maneuvers due to uncertainties in wind conditions, leading to degraded performance and controllability, particularly in rotorcraft and VTOL aircraft.

Innovation Solution

An automatic low-speed aircraft maneuver wind compensation system that utilizes a flight control computer to compute two-dimensional relative horizontal airspeed by combining steady wind data and groundspeed data, adjusting trim controls and applying these changes through flight element control actuators, while accounting for wind gusts using feedback loops.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If pilots manually compensate for wind during low-speed maneuvers, then controllability is maintained through pilot knowledge and experience, but precision of maneuvers degrades due to inaccurate wind data and reactive control approach

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovecontrollabilityVSAvoidmaneuver precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary wind compensation calculations before maneuvers are executed. The flight control computer continuously computes feedforward trim control adjustments based on predicted wind effects, preparing compensation signals in advance rather than reacting after disturbances occur. This proactive approach maintains both controllability and precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops that continuously monitor actual wind conditions, aircraft state, and maneuver performance. This feedback is used to refine wind compensation calculations and adjust trim controls in real-time, transforming the previously open-loop manual compensation into a closed-loop automated system that maintains precision while improving reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of operation

If reactive disturbance rejection is used to compensate for wind, then controllability is maintained through pilot input, but maneuver precision degrades due to the reactive rather than proactive approach

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol responsivenessVSAvoidlow-speed maneuver precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The flight control computer calculates feedforward trim control adjustments based on predicted wind effects before maneuvers are executed. This preliminary computation of compensation signals allows the system to proactively counteract wind disturbances, maintaining precision while preserving ease of operation through automated control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically switches between feedforward and feedback control modes depending on flight conditions and maneuver type. During steady-state low-speed maneuvers, feedforward control provides precise wind compensation, while feedback control handles transient disturbances, creating a dynamic control system that optimizes both responsiveness and precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Extent of automation

If automated control systems reject disturbances reactively, then ease of operation improves through automation, but maneuver precision degrades due to lack of accurate wind information

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol automationVSAvoidhover-type maneuver precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The automated flight control system incorporates feedback loops that continuously monitor wind conditions, aircraft state, and maneuver performance. This feedback enables the automated system to accurately assess actual wind effects and adjust trim controls precisely, maintaining hover precision while preserving the benefits of automation. The feedback transforms the automated system from blindly reactive to intelligently responsive.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The automated flight control computer performs preliminary calculations of wind compensation adjustments based on predicted wind effects and desired maneuver parameters. This feedforward computation allows the automated system to proactively apply precise trim control adjustments, maintaining hover precision while preserving automation benefits without relying on reactive disturbance rejection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20230229173A1Automatic low-speed aircraft maneuver wind compensation
Publication Date: 2023.07.20 TEXTRON INNOVATIONS INC
  • US20230229173A1 patent drawing
  • US20230229173A1 patent drawing
  • US20230229173A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Automatic low-speed aircraft maneuver wind compensation is implemented by an aircraft flight control system flight control computer (FCC) configured to receive or retrieve steady wind data and retrieve groundspeed data for the aircraft. The FCC computes two-dimensional relative horizontal airspeed (i.e., horizontal relative to the surface of the earth) for the aircraft, using the steady wind data and the groundspeed data for the aircraft, and computes relative changes in trim controls of the aircraft using the two-dimensional relative horizontal airspeed of the aircraft. The resulting relative changes in controls of the aircraft due to relative horizontal airspeed changes are applied to flight element control actuators.