Airflow Manipulation of Deformable Objects With Visual Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Precise airflow manipulation of deformable objects is challenging due to complex aerodynamics and unobservable airflow parameters, making model-based approaches computationally costly and difficult to control effectively.

Innovation Solution

A robotic system with a first and second gripper and a blower arm, controlled by processors, performs grasping and blowing actions on deformable objects using a self-supervised learning framework to adjust airflow direction based on visual feedback, allowing simultaneous force application in a three-dimensional space.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If model-based approaches are used for airflow manipulation, then manipulation precision can be improved, but computational cost increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveairflow parameter precisionVSAvoidcomputational cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex model-based computational approaches with a reinforcement learning agent that learns airflow manipulation policies through simulation. This substitutes the mechanical/computational system of aerodynamic modeling with a data-driven learning system that achieves comparable manipulation precision without the high computational cost of real-time aerodynamic simulations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a simplified simulation environment that copies the essential physics of airflow-deformable object interactions. Instead of using complex real-world aerodynamic models, the system uses a simplified simulation that captures the key dynamics, allowing the RL agent to learn effective policies with much lower computational requirements while maintaining manipulation effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Device complexity

If standard hardware is used for airflow control, then device complexity is reduced, but action noise and control precision deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehardware complexityVSAvoidairflow parameter control precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a closed-loop control system where the reinforcement learning agent observes the state of the deformable object and adjusts airflow actions accordingly. This feedback mechanism compensates for the imprecision of standard hardware by continuously adapting actions based on observed outcomes, thereby achieving better effective control precision without requiring complex hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts airflow parameters (such as blowing duration, intensity, and timing) based on the learned policy and observed object state. By changing these parameters adaptively rather than using fixed control settings, the system compensates for hardware limitations and achieves precise manipulation despite using standard, simple airflow generation devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If direct contact manipulation is used, then control precision is improved, but adaptability to deformable objects deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanipulation control precisionVSAvoidadaptability to deformable objects
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces airflow as an intermediary between the robot and the deformable object. Instead of direct contact, the system uses air blasts to manipulate objects, which serves as a flexible mediator that can adapt to various deformable object types (clothes, bags, blankets) while still achieving effective manipulation through learned control policies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables efficient manipulation of under-actuated objects with large surface areas or volumes by expanding workspace and improving task efficiency, such as cloth unfolding and bag opening, without requiring direct contact.

Implementation Method 1

blowing air toward the deformable object using an air pump of a blower robot arm

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAirflow:

Data Source

PatentUS12528190B2Systems and methods for deformable object manipulation using air
Publication Date: 2026.01.20 TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK
  • US12528190B2 patent drawing
  • US12528190B2 patent drawing
  • US12528190B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for manipulating deformable objects using air are disclosed. In one embodiment, a system for manipulating a deformable object, the system includes a first robot arm having a first gripper, a second robot arm having a second gripper, a blower robot arm having an air pump, and one or more processors programmed to control the first robot arm and the second robot arm to grasp the deformable object using the first gripper and the second gripper, respectively, and to control the blower robot arm to perform a plurality of blowing actions onto the deformable object until an objective is satisfied.