Data Center Airflow Redundancy Control for Efficient Cooling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional data center cooling redundancy techniques lead to inefficient cooling efficiency and high operational costs due to over-provisioning and lack of consideration for the positioning and capacity of cooling units, resulting in varying redundancy levels across different locations.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a cooling influence redundancy level system, where fluid moving devices actively monitor and regulate conditions at specific locations, allowing for dynamic redundancy management by assigning multiple devices to subsets of locations based on their influence levels, using a model predictive controller to minimize energy consumption and respond to failures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If all cooling units are constantly run at full capacity to accommodate worst-case failure scenarios, then cooling redundancy is achieved, but cooling efficiency greatly decreases and operational costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling redundancyVSAvoidcooling efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts cooling unit operation based on real-time conditions and failure scenarios. Instead of static full-capacity operation, the controller continuously optimizes which cooling units operate and at what capacity, transitioning between different operational states to maintain redundancy while minimizing energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters (which cooling units are active, their capacity levels) based on the specific failure scenario and current conditions. By adjusting these parameters dynamically, the system achieves the required redundancy level without constantly operating all units at maximum capacity, thereby improving cooling efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If all cooling units are constantly run at full capacity to accommodate worst-case failure scenarios, then cooling redundancy is achieved, but operational costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling redundancyVSAvoidoperational costs
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically determines which cooling units to operate based on the current failure scenario and environmental conditions. This dynamic approach allows the system to maintain required redundancy levels while minimizing the number of active cooling units and their operating capacity, thereby reducing energy loss and operational costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The controller adjusts operational parameters such as the selection of active cooling units and their capacity levels based on real-time conditions. By optimizing these parameters, the system achieves the necessary cooling redundancy without the excessive energy consumption and operational costs associated with running all units at full capacity continuously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If conventional redundancy practices are used without considering positioning and capacity of cooling units, then simple redundancy is achieved, but cooling efficiency decreases and costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveredundancy levelVSAvoidcooling efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system assigns different roles and capacities to different cooling units based on their specific positioning and capabilities. Instead of treating all cooling units uniformly, the controller optimizes the contribution of each unit according to its local characteristics, thereby improving overall cooling efficiency while maintaining the required redundancy level.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system pre-determines the influence levels of cooling units on different locations and uses this information to optimize the assignment of cooling units to specific zones. By performing this optimization in advance based on positioning and capacity data, the system achieves efficient cooling distribution without requiring all units to operate at full capacity, thereby improving productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10228668B2Management of airflow provisioning to meet a cooling influence redundancy level
Publication Date: 2019.03.12 HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE DEV LP
  • US10228668B2 patent drawing
  • US10228668B2 patent drawing
  • US10228668B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In an implementation, airflow provisioning in an area by a plurality of fluid moving devices is managed through assignment of the fluid moving devices to monitor and regulate conditions at respective subsets of a plurality of locations based upon determined influence levels of the fluid moving devices on the respective locations to meet a predefined cooling influence redundancy level. The predefined cooling influence redundancy level for a particular location identifies a number of the fluid moving devices that are to monitor and regulate a condition at the particular location.