Airflow Sensor Failure Diagnosis via Computational Cross-Checking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Airflow-based engine control systems face challenges in accurately diagnosing sensor failures, particularly in measuring airflow mass and EGR rate, due to the slower dynamics of airflow compared to fuel delivery, which can lead to inconsistencies in air-fuel ratios and emissions control.

Innovation Solution

A diagnostic unit is implemented to compare pairs of values derived from different calculations and measurements, using methods such as the ideal gas law and oxygen concentration ratios, to identify discrepancies in airflow mass and EGR rate sensors, enabling real-time failure diagnosis and potential faults in sensors like the intake pressure and O2 sensors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-generated harmful factors

If airflow-based control systems are used to meet emission standards, then emissions control is improved, but the slower dynamics of airflow compared to fuel delivery cause delays in achieving desired air-fuel ratios

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveemissionsVSAvoidairflow response speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces direct mechanical airflow control with a computational approach. A diagnostic unit compares multiple calculated airflow values derived from different sensor inputs (MAF sensor, manifold pressure sensor, temperature sensors) and engine parameters to identify discrepancies without requiring physical airflow adjustment mechanisms. This substitution of mechanical control with computational diagnostics resolves the contradiction by enabling accurate emission control through software-based compensation rather than mechanical response.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary diagnostic unit that mediates between multiple sensors and the engine control system. This unit compares airflow values calculated from different measurement pathways (direct MAF measurement versus calculated from manifold pressure and temperature) to detect sensor failures. The intermediary layer enables the system to reconcile the slower airflow dynamics with the need for precise emission control by identifying and compensating for measurement errors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If multiple sensors are used for accurate airflow measurement, then measurement precision is improved, but the complexity of diagnosing sensor failures increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveairflow mass measurementVSAvoidsensor failure diagnosis
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the airflow measurement function into multiple independent calculation pathways, each using different sensor combinations. The diagnostic unit compares these segmented calculations (MAF-based airflow versus manifold pressure and temperature-based airflow) to identify which specific sensor or calculation pathway is failing. This segmentation transforms a complex diagnostic problem into manageable, comparable units, resolving the contradiction between using multiple sensors for precision and the complexity of diagnosing their failures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If real-time sensor monitoring is implemented to detect failures quickly, then reliability is improved, but the computational requirements and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensor failure detectionVSAvoiddiagnostic system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The diagnostic system performs self-service by using the existing sensor inputs and engine parameters already required for normal operation. The diagnostic unit calculates airflow values using the same sensors (MAF, manifold pressure, temperature sensors) and engine data (speed, load) that the engine control system already processes for fuel injection and emission control. This self-service approach improves reliability through real-time monitoring without adding separate dedicated diagnostic sensors or complex external diagnostic equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for accurate and timely identification of sensor failures, ensuring consistent engine control outputs and reducing emissions by maintaining precise air-fuel ratios, thereby enhancing the reliability of airflow-based combustion control systems.

Implementation Method 1

using methods such as the ideal gas law and oxygen concentration ratios

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectIdeal gas law: Boyle's Law

Data Source

PatentUS8521354B2Diagnosis of sensor failure in airflow-based engine control system
Publication Date: 2013.08.27 SOUTHWEST RES INST
  • US8521354B2 patent drawing
  • US8521354B2 patent drawing
  • US8521354B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An air-flow based control system for an internal combustion engine has various sensors that are used to calculate various control commands. By comparing pairs of values calculated from different sensors, errors in connection with the sensors can be detected.