Turbomachine Airfoil Array Contoured Surface

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Turbomachine airfoil arrays in gas turbines face inefficiencies due to secondary and cooling air flow losses, which are not adequately addressed by existing designs.

Innovation Solution

The airfoil array features a contoured circumferential surface with an elevation contour line that is depressed relative to a reference surface near the leading edge and merges smoothly into a non-depressed section near the trailing edge, optimizing flow passages between airfoils and improving secondary and cooling air flows.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If conventional airfoil arrays are used, then the structure is simple and manufacturing is easy, but secondary and cooling air flow losses occur due to inadequate flow passage design

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecondary and cooling air flow lossesVSAvoidcontoured circumferential surface geometry
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The circumferential surface is designed with different local geometries: a first section with a depression (contoured shape) and a second section that is substantially planar. This local differentiation optimizes flow characteristics in specific regions while maintaining manufacturing simplicity in other areas, thereby reducing energy losses without excessive complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The first section of the circumferential surface features a contoured, curved geometry with a depression rather than a flat surface. This curvature modification optimizes the flow passage boundaries, improving secondary and cooling air flows and reducing energy losses associated with conventional flat-surface designs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

2Productivity

If the circumferential surface is fully contoured, then flow passage optimization is maximized, but manufacturing complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow passage efficiencyVSAvoidmanufacturing of contoured circumferential surface
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

Rather than making the entire circumferential surface contoured, only the first section is given a depressed, contoured geometry while the second section remains substantially planar. This localized approach achieves flow optimization where most needed while keeping manufacturing processes simpler and more cost-effective

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The invention applies partial contoured action - the circumferential surface is contoured only in the first section rather than along its entire length. This partial application of the contoured geometry provides sufficient flow passage optimization to improve productivity without requiring the full manufacturing complexity that would result from contouring the entire surface

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS10876410B2Turbomachine airfoil array
Publication Date: 2020.12.29 MTU AERO ENGINES GMBH
  • US10876410B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An airfoil array for a turbomachine, in particular a turbine or compressor stage of a gas turbine. The airfoil array includes at least two airfoils and at least one contoured circumferential surface which connects a pressure side of one airfoil to a suction side of the other airfoil and includes an upstream first section and a downstream second section which adjoins the first section along an elevation contour line; the first section being depressed relative to a rotationally symmetric reference surface containing this elevation contour line away from the airfoils, and the second section not being depressed relative to this reference surface away from the airfoils; this elevation contour line lying in an axial area which terminates at most 30% of an axial chord length of one of the airfoils downstream of its leading edge; and an axial distance of this elevation contour line increasing toward the pressure side and toward the suction side, starting at a point between the pressure and suction sides that is closest to the leading edge; and the first section extending over at least 90% of the space between the pressure side and the suction side.