Multiwall Airfoil Core Boss Positioning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional methods for controlling location and rib wall thickness in multiwall casting processes, such as using bumpers, lead to uncertainties in cooling flow distribution and often result in holes between cavities, making it difficult to achieve precise cooling flow and rib wall thickness control in turbine systems.

Innovation Solution

The use of bosses extending from a cantilevered core section to the outer profile of a multiwall airfoil core, which provides positional and thickness control during the casting process, eliminating the need for bumpers and ensuring precise positioning and thickness control without forming holes between center plenums and outer cooling passages.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If bumpers are used to control location and rib wall thickness, then positioning control is provided, but holes form between cavities leading to uncertain cooling flow distribution

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverib wall thickness controlVSAvoidcooling flow distribution
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the bumper component entirely from the core design. Instead of using separate bumpers to control gap distances, the core itself is designed with integrated thickness control features where the core material directly defines the desired gap dimensions between cooling passages and the airfoil wall, eliminating the source of hole formation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Rather than using protruding bumpers that can contact and potentially bridge gaps between cavities, the invention inverts the approach by using recessed or integrated thickness control features within the core structure. The core's own geometry, rather than added components, defines the precise spacing and prevents hole formation at critical interfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

2Manufacturing precision

If bumpers are used for positioning control, then location control is achieved, but the number of holes formed is unknown creating uncertainty

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocation controlVSAvoidcooling flow distribution uncertainty
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The core design is self-sufficient with integrated thickness control features built directly into its structure. The core automatically maintains precise positioning and gap control through its own geometry without requiring external bumpers, ensuring consistent cooling flow paths and eliminating variability in hole formation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of manufacture

If traditional casting methods are used, then the process is simple, but expensive MRI measurements are needed to verify rib wall thickness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecasting process simplicityVSAvoidrib wall thickness verification
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The desired rib wall thickness and gap dimensions are pre-built into the core's geometry during core fabrication. By incorporating thickness control features directly into the core design before casting, the final airfoil part achieves the target dimensions without requiring post-casting verification through expensive MRI scanning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentEP3323528B1Support for a multiwall core
Publication Date: 2020.05.27 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO
  • EP3323528B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3323528B1 patent drawingFigure 2~5
  • EP3323528B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A core 10 for an airfoil casting, including: a cantilevered core section 234; and a boss extending 252 from the cantilevered core section to an outer profile of the core.