Airfoil Hump Feature Reduces Flow Separation and Heat Loads

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Gas turbine engine airfoil arrays with low camber angles experience flow separation, leading to increased aerodynamic losses and convective heat loads due to fluid flow separation, which existing technologies have not adequately addressed.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating a hump feature near the leading edges of airfoils within the airfoil array, which influences fluid flow and limits separation by altering the flow passage geometry, specifically between the airfoils and endwalls, to reduce convective heat loads and enhance aerodynamic performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If airfoils with low camber angles are used, then aerodynamic losses are reduced, but flow separation occurs increasing convective heat loads

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaerodynamic lossesVSAvoidconvective heat loads
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention applies a hump feature locally at the leading edge of airfoils where flow separation occurs. This localized geometric modification alters the flow characteristics specifically at the critical region without changing the overall airfoil camber angle, thereby maintaining low aerodynamic losses while reducing flow separation and associated convective heat loads.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The hump feature is positioned upstream of the airfoil leading edge to preemptively influence the flow before it enters the airfoil. This preliminary geometric modification modifies the flow attachment and reduces separation tendencies before they can develop into harmful vortices that would increase convective heat loads.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Object-affected harmful factors

If flow separation is allowed to occur, then aerodynamic losses increase, but convective heat loads are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconvective heat loadsVSAvoidaerodynamic losses
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The hump feature provides localized flow control exactly where separation initiates. By modifying the leading edge geometry locally, the flow attachment is improved without requiring changes to the entire airfoil section, thus preventing the trade-off between reducing heat loads and accepting aerodynamic losses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Object-affected harmful factors

If hump feature is added to airfoil assembly, then flow separation is reduced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow separationVSAvoidairfoil assembly complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The hump feature is implemented as a discrete, modular element that can be independently manufactured and then assembled to the airfoil. This segmentation allows the complex flow control function to be achieved through a simple, isolated geometric feature rather than a complex overall airfoil redesign, minimizing the increase in device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The hump feature effectively reduces aerodynamic losses and convective heat loads by minimizing flow separation, thereby improving the overall performance of airfoil arrays, particularly those with low camber angles.

Implementation Method 1

air approaching the fluid flow passages can separate from portions of the arrays. The separation within the engine can disadvantageously increase aerodynamic losses and can contribute to locally increased convective heat loads.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFlow separation: Flow Separation

Implementation Method 2

Air within the engine moves through fluid flow passages in the arrays. The fluid flow passages are established by adjacent airfoils projecting from laterally extending endwalls.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluid flow:

Implementation Method 3

The separation within the engine can disadvantageously increase aerodynamic losses and can contribute to locally increased convective heat loads.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConvection: Convection

Data Source

PatentEP2241721B1Airfoil assembly, corresponding gas turbine engine assembly and method of influencing flow in a gas turbine engine
Publication Date: 2019.07.03 UNITED TECH CORP
  • EP2241721B1 patent drawingFigure 1~4
  • EP2241721B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP2241721B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

An example airfoil assembly includes a base (60) having an airfoil (54) projecting radially therefrom. The base (60) extends laterally away from the airfoil (54). The airfoil (54) extends axially from an airfoil leading edge portion (62) to an airfoil trailing edge portion (66). The base (60) has a humped area (74) forward the airfoil leading edge portion (62).