Turbine Airfoil Impingement Insert Cooling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Gas turbine airfoils face inefficiencies in fluid cooling due to crossflow in the post-impingement cavity and non-optimized flow paths, leading to reduced cooling effectiveness and thermal stress under high operating temperatures and pressures.

Innovation Solution

An impingement insert with angled fins and cooling holes is integrated into the airfoil, enhancing fluid recirculation and heat transfer by increasing the cooling surface area and optimizing fluid flow, allowing for more uniform coolant distribution and reduced fluid usage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Temperature

If conventional cooling manifolds with impingement holes are used, then cooling is provided to the airfoil, but crossflow in the post-impingement cavity inhibits cooling effectiveness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling effectivenessVSAvoidflow path optimization
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The cooling system is segmented into distinct functional zones: impingement holes for direct cooling, angled fins for flow direction control, and a post-impingement cavity for recirculation. This segmentation allows each component to address specific cooling challenges independently, eliminating crossflow issues while maintaining effective cooling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces angled fins that extend into the post-impingement cavity, adding a third dimension to the flow path control. These fins create vertical flow components that redirect coolant away from crossflow patterns, transforming the two-dimensional cavity flow into a three-dimensional recirculation pattern that enhances cooling effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Temperature

If cooling fluid flow is increased to overcome crossflow, then cooling effectiveness may improve, but fluid usage increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling effectivenessVSAvoidfluid usage
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The angled fins create a recirculation pattern where cooling fluid is redirected back toward the impingement zone, forming a feedback loop. This recirculation allows the same fluid to multiple passes over critical heat zones, increasing cooling effectiveness without proportionally increasing fluid consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The cooling system combines multiple flow path elements (impingement holes, angled fins, cavity structures) into a composite cooling architecture. This composite structure optimizes fluid utilization by creating interconnected flow paths that maximize heat transfer efficiency per unit of coolant.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Use of energy by moving object

If conventional impingement cooling is used, then cooling is provided, but non-optimized flow paths reduce cooling efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling efficiencyVSAvoidflow path structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The angled fins are strategically positioned at specific angles and locations within the post-impingement cavity to optimize local flow patterns. Each fin is designed with specific geometric properties tailored to redirect flow in critical cooling zones, creating locally optimized flow paths that enhance overall cooling efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent modifies flow path parameters by introducing fins with specific angles, heights, and spacing. These parameter changes transform the flow regime from crossflow-dominated to recirculation-dominated, optimizing the energy utilization of the cooling fluid without requiring fundamental system redesign.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration improves cooling efficiency, reduces thermal stress, and extends the service life of turbine components by increasing the heat transfer coefficient by up to 20% and achieving uniform temperature distribution.

Implementation Method 1

The fluid then exits the manifold through impingement holes into a post-impingement cavity

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectImpingement cooling: Convection

Implementation Method 2

crossflow in the post-impingement cavity, and non-optimized flow paths inhibit fluid cooling

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTurbulence: Turbulence

Implementation Method 3

subsequently exits the post-impingement cavity through apertures in the exterior wall of the airfoil, forming a film layer of the fluid on the exterior of the airfoil

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFilm cooling: Convection

Implementation Method 4

forming a film layer of the fluid on the exterior of the airfoil

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEvaporation: Evaporation

Data Source

PatentEP3401507B1Airfoil for a turbine comprising an impingement insert
Publication Date: 2021.07.07 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO
  • EP3401507B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3401507B1 patent drawingFigure 3~5
  • EP3401507B1 patent drawingFigure 6

AI summary

An airfoil (101) including a leading edge (104), a trailing edge (105), a pressure side (106), a suction side (107), and an internal impingement cavity (110). An impingement insert (120) is located within the impingement cavity (110). The impingement insert (120) includes at least one impingement cooling hole (125) spaced along a first face (127) of the impingement insert (120) and at least one impingement fin (130), having a base (132) and a tip (134) opposite the base (132), spaced along the first face (127) of the impingement insert (120). The at least one impingement fin (130) is spaced apart from the at least one impingement cooling hole (125).