Airfoil Multi-Material Reinforcement for Impact Protection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Fan blades in turbine engines, particularly those made of composite materials like carbon fiber reinforced epoxy, are prone to brittle fracture and delamination during foreign object impacts due to low ductility, and metallic cladding adds weight without fully addressing these issues.

Innovation Solution

An airfoil design incorporating regions with increased elongation properties using composite materials, specifically a primary region with carbon fibers and secondary regions with glass fibers, combined with metallic cladding elements for enhanced impact resistance and weight management.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If metallic cladding is used over extensive areas of the airfoil, then impact protection is improved, but weight increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact protectionVSAvoidblade weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies metallic cladding selectively only to the leading edge region where impact damage is most critical, rather than covering the entire airfoil surface. This localized application provides necessary impact protection at the high-risk area while avoiding the weight penalty of extensive cladding coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses a composite structure combining metallic cladding on the leading edge with composite airfoil material in the remaining areas. This multi-material approach leverages the high impact resistance of metal where needed while maintaining the weight advantages of composite materials in less critical regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Productivity

If thin airfoil design is used for best aerodynamic performance, then aerodynamic efficiency is improved, but susceptibility to impact damage increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaerodynamic performanceVSAvoidimpact resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent reinforces the thin airfoil design by applying metallic cladding specifically to the leading edge region where impact damage is most likely to occur. This allows the airfoil to maintain its thin, aerodynamically efficient profile while providing localized impact protection where the thin structure is most vulnerable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The metallic cladding is applied in advance to the leading edge region to prevent impact damage before it occurs. This preliminary protective measure allows the airfoil to maintain its thin design for aerodynamic performance while being pre-protected against the specific threat of leading edge impact damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10494933B2Airfoil with multi-material reinforcement
Publication Date: 2019.12.03 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO
  • US10494933B2 patent drawing
  • US10494933B2 patent drawing
  • US10494933B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An airfoil includes: an airfoil body having convex and concave sides extending between a leading edge and a trailing edge, the airfoil body including primary and secondary regions having differing physical properties; and at least one metallic cladding element attached to the airfoil body.