Airfoil Spar Assembly Composite Wrap Bonding

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional airfoils in turbine engines face challenges with extreme loading conditions, such as ingestion of foreign materials, where the structural integrity of composite materials with metal spars is compromised due to lack of effective bonding between composite and metallic components.

Innovation Solution

The airfoil incorporates a spar assembly with a composite spar and a metallic hub, where a composite body or wrap is used to create a structural joint at the overlapping region, enhancing bonding and providing a redundant load path through the composite wrap, which secures the composite spar to the metallic hub.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If composite materials are used in airfoils to reduce weight and improve strength-to-weight ratio, then weight is reduced and strength is improved, but bonding between composite and metallic components is insufficient under extreme loading conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestrength to weight ratioVSAvoidbonding between composite and metallic components
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention uses a composite wrap made of fiber-reinforced polymer material to bond the composite spar to the metallic hub. This composite-to-composite bonding approach (wrapping composite material around composite spar) provides superior bond strength and reliability under extreme loading conditions compared to traditional metal-to-composite bonding, while maintaining the weight benefits of composite materials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The composite wrap acts as an intermediary layer between the composite spar and the metallic hub, providing a transition zone that ensures reliable load transfer. The wrap circumscribes both components and creates a bonded interface that distributes stresses effectively, preventing delamination and bond failure under extreme conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Strength

If traditional metal spars are used in composite airfoils, then structural support is provided, but bonding between metal and composite materials is insufficient during ingestion events

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural supportVSAvoiddamage during ingestion events
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention replaces the traditional metal spar with a composite spar made of fiber-reinforced polymer material. This composite spar is then wrapped with a composite wrap that bonds it to the metallic hub, creating a composite-to-composite interface that is more resistant to damage during ingestion events compared to traditional metal-to-composite bonding.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The composite wrap serves as a protective layer that cushions and distributes the impact loads from ingestion events before they reach the bond interface. This pre-positioned protective structure prevents sudden bond failure by absorbing and distributing extreme forces throughout the wrap and into the hub and spar.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

3Reliability

If a composite wrap is added to bond the composite spar to the metallic hub, then bond strength is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebond strengthVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention merges the bonding function and the protective function into a single composite wrap structure. The wrap simultaneously bonds the composite spar to the metallic hub and protects the interface from damage, eliminating the need for separate bonding layers or protective structures. This integrated approach improves bond strength while minimizing the increase in structural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The composite wrap performs multiple functions: it bonds the spar to the hub, distributes stresses, protects the bond interface from ingestion damage, and maintains structural integrity. This multi-functional design achieves high reliability without proportionally increasing complexity, as a single component accomplishes what would otherwise require multiple separate elements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS11982205B1Airfoil having a spar assembly for a turbine engine
Publication Date: 2024.05.14 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO
  • US11982205B1 patent drawing
  • US11982205B1 patent drawing
  • US11982205B1 patent drawing

AI summary

An airfoil for a turbine engine having a spar assembly. The spar assembly including a composite spar, a metallic hub, and a composite body. The metallic hub can receive a portion of the composite spar at an interior surface to define an overlapping region. The composite body is located at the overlapping region.