Gas Turbine Airfoil Spar Segmented Plenum Cooling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Implementing ceramic matrix composite (CMC) materials in gas turbine engine airfoils is challenging due to the need for effective cooling, particularly at the leading edge where insufficient pressure cooling air poses a problem, and existing designs struggle to efficiently segregate and direct cooling air flows to optimize temperature management.

Innovation Solution

A spar design for vane arc segments in gas turbine engines featuring ribs that segregate the plenum passage into radial or circumferential zones, with through-holes to regulate cooling air flow, and a separate cooling passage to provide impingement cooling, ensuring efficient cooling of the airfoil wall while maintaining downstream cooling air flow.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Temperature

If CMC materials are used in airfoils to extend temperature capability and lifetime, then temperature resistance is improved, but the ability to effectively cool the leading edge deteriorates due to insufficient pressure cooling air

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetemperature resistanceVSAvoidcooling effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The plenum passage is segmented into multiple zones using partitions and ribs, allowing separate control of cooling air flow to different regions of the airfoil. This enables optimized cooling distribution to the leading edge while maintaining overall system reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the airfoil are provided with different cooling characteristics through localized plenum zones. The leading edge receives targeted cooling air flow through specific partitions, creating local quality optimization where cooling effectiveness is enhanced precisely where needed despite the inherent pressure limitations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If cooling air flow is increased to improve leading edge cooling, then cooling efficiency is improved, but downstream cooling air flow is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling efficiencyVSAvoiddownstream cooling air flow
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The plenum passage is divided into multiple zones using partitions and ribs, enabling independent flow management. This segmentation allows optimized distribution of cooling air to different regions, ensuring adequate flow to both the leading edge and downstream areas simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the pressure parameters within different plenum zones to optimize cooling air distribution. By maintaining appropriate pressure differentials across partitions and ribs, the system achieves efficient cooling air flow to the leading edge while preserving sufficient downstream flow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If the plenum passage is segmented into zones to optimize cooling distribution, then cooling flow management is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling flow managementVSAvoidplenum passage structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The partitions and ribs serve dual purposes: they segment the plenum passage for optimized cooling distribution while simultaneously providing structural support to the airfoil. This merging of cooling management functions with structural elements reduces overall device complexity despite the segmentation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The ribs and partitions perform multiple functions including flow segregation, structural reinforcement, and potential integration with cooling air supply systems. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate components, thereby managing device complexity while achieving effective cooling flow management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The spar design effectively segregates cooling air flows to enhance cooling efficiency at the airfoil leading edge, maintaining structural integrity and temperature management, thereby extending the lifespan and performance of CMC airfoils.

Implementation Method 1

The plenum passage is embedded in the spar wall and delivers pressurized cooling air to the airfoil wall

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectImpingement cooling: Convection

Implementation Method 2

the ribs segregate the plenum passage into radial zones, the ribs segregate the plenum passage into circumferential zones

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluid flow segregation: Pressure Gradient

Data Source

PatentEP4015772B1Gas turbine airfoil with spar comprising an embedded plenum passage
Publication Date: 2024.06.26 RTX CORP
  • EP4015772B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4015772B1 patent drawingFigure 3
  • EP4015772B1 patent drawingFigure 4~6

AI summary

A spar (72) for a vane arc segment (60) of a gas turbine engine includes an elongated spar leg (72b) that has a spar wall (76) that circumscribes a core passage (72c). There is a plenum passage (78) embedded in the spar wall between inner (76a) and outer portions (76b) of the spar wall. The inner portion of the spar wall is fully solid such that the plenum passage is fluidly isolated from the core passage. The outer portion of the spar wall has a plurality of cooling through-holes (80) for emitting cooling air (F) from the plenum passage.