Composite Airfoil Tip Cap Reducing Deflection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Turbine engine airfoil assemblies face challenges with tip deflection and strain during operation due to mechanical stresses, which can lead to reduced performance and lifespan.

Innovation Solution

A composite airfoil assembly with a tip cap that provides additional stiffness along the tip, reducing deflection and strains. The tip cap is designed to be lightweight and enhance aerodynamic properties, and it can be made with a metallic material to provide structural support.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If additional structural support is added to the airfoil tip to reduce deflection and strain, then the stiffness and strength are improved, but the weight of the airfoil assembly increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetip stiffnessVSAvoidairfoil weight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The tip cap is constructed using composite materials, specifically a foam core (such as aluminum foam, titanium foam, or polymer foam) combined with a metallic skin (such as aluminum or titanium alloy). This composite structure provides high stiffness and strength-to-weight ratio, effectively reducing tip deflection and strain while minimizing weight increase compared to solid metallic structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The tip cap is applied locally only to the tip region of the airfoil where structural reinforcement is most needed, rather than reinforcing the entire airfoil structure. This localized approach concentrates structural support where mechanical stresses are highest during operation, improving tip stiffness without adding unnecessary weight to the entire airfoil assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If a tip cap is added to reduce tip deflection, then the structural resilience is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural resilienceVSAvoidairfoil assembly complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The tip cap is designed as a separate, modular component that can be independently manufactured and then attached to the airfoil tip. This segmentation allows for simplified manufacturing processes, easier quality control, and potential replacement or repair without affecting the entire airfoil structure, thereby managing device complexity while improving structural resilience.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The tip cap utilizes parameter changes in material properties, specifically employing foam materials with controlled density and cellular structure to achieve optimal stiffness-to-weight ratio. By adjusting foam density, cell size, and skin thickness, the structural resilience can be tuned without significantly increasing complexity or weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250188844A1Composite airfoil assembly having a tip cap
Publication Date: 2025.06.12 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO
  • US20250188844A1 patent drawing
  • US20250188844A1 patent drawing
  • US20250188844A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A composite airfoil assembly for a turbine engine. The turbine engine has a fan section, a compressor section, a combustion section, and a turbine section in serial flow arrangement. The composite airfoil assembly has an outer wall, a composite body, and a tip cap. The composite body at least partially defines the outer wall. The tip cap at least partially defines the outer wall.