Airframe Baggage Loading Simulation for Diverse Bin Profiles

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The loading of passenger airplanes is often time-consuming and complicated by the diverse types of bags brought onboard, leading to delays and inefficiencies in the loading process.

Innovation Solution

A computing device application simulates the loading of an airframe by receiving airframe, passenger, and bag profile files, allowing for the simulation of bag placement into bins based on dimensions and location, and calculating boarding times, with options for different orientations and bin spaces, including convex and non-convex hulls.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If manual baggage loading is performed, then flexibility in handling diverse bag types is maintained, but loading time increases and productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehandling diverse bag typesVSAvoidloading speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary simulation of baggage loading before actual loading occurs. The simulation module pre-calculates optimal placement positions for various bag types based on bin dimensions and bag profiles, creating a loading plan that guides the actual loading process. This preliminary action resolves the contradiction by preparing adaptive placement strategies in advance, enabling fast execution during actual loading.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates digital copies (profiles) of physical bags and bins to simulate the loading process. Bag profiles capture dimensions and characteristics of diverse bag types, while bin profiles represent storage spaces. The simulation operates on these copies to determine optimal placement, allowing the system to handle bag diversity virtually before physical loading, thus maintaining adaptability while improving productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Manufacturing precision

If simulation complexity is increased to handle diverse bag orientations and bin configurations, then placement accuracy improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebag placement accuracyVSAvoidsimulation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The simulation system segments the loading problem into distinct components: bag profiles (dimensions, characteristics), bin profiles (dimensions, configurations), and placement algorithms. Each component is handled separately with dedicated data structures and processing logic. This segmentation allows the system to manage complexity while maintaining high placement accuracy through specialized handling of each element type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses parameter-based profiles to represent bags and bins, where key dimensions and characteristics are stored as adjustable parameters. The simulation varies parameters such as bag orientation angles and placement positions to find optimal configurations. This parameter-driven approach enables accurate modeling of complex scenarios without requiring complex hard-coded logic for each situation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Volume of stationary object

If multiple bag orientations are simulated to find optimal placement, then space utilization improves, but calculation time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebin space utilizationVSAvoidcalculation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of stationary objectVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The simulation evaluates multiple bag orientations (excessive action) to ensure optimal space utilization, but applies pruning logic to stop evaluating orientations once a satisfactory placement is found. The system doesn't exhaustively check every possible orientation combination but rather samples sufficient orientations to achieve near-optimal packing. This partial/excessive approach balances thoroughness with computational efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system pre-calculates feasible orientation ranges and valid placement zones before attempting actual bag placement. By establishing preliminary constraints on which orientations are even worth considering, the system reduces the search space significantly. This preliminary filtering action enables the simulation to evaluate multiple orientations without excessive calculation time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11003813B2Baggage loading system and methods
Publication Date: 2021.05.11 SAFRAN CABIN INC
  • US11003813B2 patent drawing
  • US11003813B2 patent drawing
  • US11003813B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A non-transitory machine-readable medium of a computing device storing an application for simulating the loading of an airframe. The application includes an airframe input module that receives an airframe file having a seat having a seat location and a bin having a bin location and a bin dimensions. The application further includes a passenger profile input module that receives a passenger profile file having a list of passenger profiles, a passenger selection module that selects a passenger from the list of passenger profiles and associates the passenger with the seat, a bag selection module that selects a bag profile from a bag profile file and associates it with the passenger, a bag placement module that simulates placing the bag into the bin based on the bin dimensions, bin location, and bag profile, and an output module that outputs and stores a simulation output associating the bag and the bin.