Airframe Panel Joining via Simultaneous Edge Machining

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for joining airframe and fuselage structures in aircraft and spacecraft are inefficient and lack automation, leading to potential corrosion, fatigue, and increased production time, while requiring specialized tools for repair.

Innovation Solution

A method involving machining of panel edges to form congruent joining surfaces, followed by alignment and fusion using techniques like laser beam welding or friction stir welding, with optional incorporation of metal strips or connector pins, to create strong and lightweight joints.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If traditional fastening methods (rivets, welding) are used to join panel modules, then structural strength is achieved, but production time increases and automation is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvejoint strengthVSAvoidproduction speed
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple joining operations (machining of both panel edges and formation of joining surfaces) into a single simultaneous operation. The cutting tool machines both panel edges at the same time, merging what would traditionally be separate sequential operations into one unified process, thereby doubling the effective production rate without compromising joint strength

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary machining of panel edges to create precise joining surfaces before the actual joining process. By pre-forming the surfaces with exact geometry and fit during the simultaneous cutting operation, the subsequent joining process becomes faster and more automated, as the panels are already prepared for optimal alignment and connection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Manufacturing precision

If multiple sequential machining operations are performed on panel edges, then joining precision is improved, but production time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvejoining surface precisionVSAvoidproduction time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the machining of both panel edges into a single simultaneous operation using a cutting tool that processes both panels at once. This maintains manufacturing precision by ensuring both edges are machined to the same tolerance standards while eliminating the time required for sequential operations and repositioning

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The simultaneous cutting operation ensures continuous useful action by machining both panel edges without interruption or repositioning. The cutting tool continuously removes material from both panels in a single uninterrupted motion, eliminating idle time between operations while maintaining precise dimensional control through continuous tool engagement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Strength

If conventional joining methods are used, then structural integrity is achieved, but corrosion resistance and fatigue life are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidcorrosion and fatigue resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts or eliminates traditional fastening elements (rivets, welds) from the joining process by creating precision-machined joining surfaces that enable direct mechanical coupling or alternative joining methods. This removal of corrosive fastening materials eliminates the primary sources of corrosion and stress concentration that lead to fatigue failure, while maintaining structural integrity through the precision-fit joint design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method enhances production efficiency, reduces material waste, and provides a fail-safe structure with improved corrosion resistance and reduced risk of fatigue, enabling faster and more automated panel joining with simpler repair solutions.

Implementation Method 1

joining techniques like laser beam welding

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaser beam welding: Laser Beam Welding

Implementation Method 2

friction stir welding

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction stir welding: Friction Welding

Data Source

PatentUS10118685B2Method of joining panels for an airframe
Publication Date: 2018.11.06 AIRBUS OPERATIONS GMBH
  • US10118685B2 patent drawing
  • US10118685B2 patent drawing
  • US10118685B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of joining two panels of an airframe or fuselage structure of an aircraft or spacecraft, including: preparing an edge region of a first panel to form a first joining surface; preparing an edge region of a second panel to form a second joining surface; aligning the panels with one another such that the joining surfaces abut or interface one another forming a joint area; and joining the panels at the joining surfaces in the joint area. In an embodiment, the preparing steps include machining, and cutting, the edge regions of the first and second panels in a single operation to form the first and second joining surfaces substantially simultaneously. In another embodiment, the first and second joining surfaces are substantially planar and extend at an oblique angle with respect to a primary plane or surface of the respective first and second panels.