Dynamic Airport Task Allocation System for Real-Time Staff Deployment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing airport task management systems fail to adapt to real-time changes in flight schedules and passenger demand, leading to inefficient resource allocation and potential under or over utilization of staff in different areas.

Innovation Solution

A system that receives and processes event data, including staff and flight information, to dynamically update the airport's service level and send task alerts to staff members when necessary, ensuring that resources are allocated effectively based on current conditions, such as cleanliness thresholds and passenger numbers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If staff are scheduled to work in locations based on expected passenger throughput, then resource allocation is optimized for anticipated demand, but the schedule cannot adapt to real-time flight changes and passenger demand variations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to real-time flight changesVSAvoidoutdated schedule information
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from static scheduling based on anticipated passenger throughput to dynamic real-time scheduling that continuously updates staff allocations based on actual flight status changes and passenger demand variations. The processor dynamically adjusts task alerts and staff assignments in response to incoming event data about flight delays, cancellations, and gate reassignments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where real-time event data about flight changes and passenger demand is processed to update staff schedules and task allocations. The system monitors actual conditions and adjusts scheduling decisions based on feedback from flight status updates, gate assignments, and passenger throughput data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If staff are sent to areas with highest anticipated demand, then resource utilization is maximized for expected patterns, but resources are wasted when actual demand differs due to flight delays or gate reassignments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource utilization efficiencyVSAvoidwasted staff time and resources
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary scheduling based on anticipated demand patterns, but continuously updates and adjusts these assignments in real-time as actual flight status and passenger demand information becomes available. Task alerts are sent to staff members to adjust their locations in response to changing conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes scheduling parameters dynamically based on real-time event data. When flight delays, cancellations, or gate reassignments occur, the system updates staff allocation parameters and sends task alerts to adjust staff positions, ensuring resources are deployed according to actual rather than anticipated demand conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If a static schedule is used for staff allocation, then the system is simple to implement, but it cannot respond to real-time changes in flight schedules and passenger demand

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereal-time response capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses a multi-functional processor that handles multiple tasks including receiving event data, updating flight schedules, monitoring passenger demand, determining service levels, and sending task alerts to staff members. This centralized processing approach consolidates complexity into a single coordinated system rather than separate independent modules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically monitors real-time conditions and self-adjusts staff allocations without requiring manual intervention. The processor continuously processes event data, compares service levels against thresholds, and autonomously sends task alerts to staff members to adjust their positions, enabling the system to self-optimize resource distribution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Reliability

If staff are allocated based on anticipated passenger throughput, then planning is straightforward, but it leads to under-resourcing at areas with unexpected increases in usage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice level reliabilityVSAvoidstaff deployment effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors actual passenger demand and flight status, comparing real-time conditions against service level thresholds. When demand exceeds anticipated levels or flight changes occur, the system receives feedback and automatically sends task alerts to deploy additional staff to affected areas, ensuring service level reliability is maintained despite unexpected variations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20230351280A1A system and method for automatic task management and allocation in an airport
Publication Date: 2023.11.02 SITA INFORMATION NETWORKING COMPUTING UK LTD
  • US20230351280A1 patent drawing
  • US20230351280A1 patent drawing
  • US20230351280A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention is directed to a system and method for automatic task management and allocation in an airport. The method comprises receiving, at a receiving module, event data, wherein the event data comprises flight data and staff data, and wherein the staff data further comprises staff location data of a plurality of staff members; and storing, at a storage module, airport mapping data. The method then continues with a processor updating a current state of the airport based on the received event data, wherein the current state of the airport comprises a service level and comparing the service level to a threshold range. A resource allocation module may then send a task alert to one or more of the plurality of staff members if the service level is determined to be outside of the threshold range and subsequently clear the task alert if the service level is subsequently determined to be within the threshold range.