Airport Autonomous Vehicle Sensing for 360° Obstacle Avoidance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing autonomous vehicles designed for public roadways are not suitable for airport operations due to the absence or difference in infrastructure, leading to inefficiencies and increased costs.

Innovation Solution

An autonomous vehicle system equipped with obstacle sensors, including 3D LiDAR and depth sensors, and a machine learning module, capable of navigating and avoiding obstacles within airports by generating a fused point cloud and predicting object trajectories to alter its path as needed.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If autonomous vehicles designed for public roadways are used in airports, then automation is achieved, but reliability deteriorates due to absence of familiar infrastructure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautonomous navigationVSAvoidoperation reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the operational parameters by replacing infrastructure-dependent sensors (lane markings, traffic lights) with infrastructure-independent sensors (LiDAR, depth sensors, cameras) that can operate in airport environments without public roadway infrastructure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces airport-specific infrastructure elements such as visual guidance markings, lighting systems, and communication protocols as intermediaries between the autonomous vehicle and the airport environment, enabling reliable operation without public roadway infrastructure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If manually operated vehicles are used in airports, then operational flexibility is maintained, but productivity decreases due to scheduling conflicts and human error

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoidoperational flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The autonomous vehicle performs self-navigation, self-monitoring, and self-correction using onboard sensors and processors, eliminating the need for manual operation while maintaining operational flexibility through autonomous decision-making algorithms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where sensors monitor the environment, processors analyze data, and the vehicle adjusts its path in real-time, enabling autonomous operation that maintains flexibility while improving productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If public roadway autonomous vehicle systems are deployed in airports, then cost reduction is expected, but adaptability deteriorates due to different environmental conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenvironmental adaptabilityVSAvoidsensor system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The sensor system is segmented into specialized modules (LiDAR for long-range detection, depth sensors for medium-range, cameras for visual recognition) that can independently process different types of environmental information, improving adaptability while managing complexity through modular architecture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The sensor suite is designed to perform multiple functions - obstacle detection, navigation, environmental mapping, and situation awareness - using a unified system architecture that reduces overall complexity while enhancing adaptability to various airport conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances operational efficiency and safety by enabling autonomous navigation and task execution in airport environments, reducing human error and scheduling conflicts.

Implementation Method 1

The obstacle sensor is a planar LiDAR sensor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLIDAR: LIDAR

Implementation Method 2

The plurality of obstacle depth sensors includes a plurality of three-dimensional (3D) image sensors

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight reflection: Reflection

Data Source

PatentUS20230341859A1Autonomous vehicle for airports
Publication Date: 2023.10.26 PATTERN LABS
  • US20230341859A1 patent drawing
  • US20230341859A1 patent drawing
  • US20230341859A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods provide an autonomous vehicle for operation in an airport. The autonomous vehicle includes a frame, a platform coupled to the frame and configured to support a load, a plurality of obstacle depth sensors positioned relative to the frame and together configured to detect obstacles 360 degrees about the frame, an obstacle planar sensor positioned relative to the frame and configured to detect obstacles in a horizontal plane about the frame, and an electronic processor coupled to the plurality of obstacle depth sensors and the obstacle planar sensor. The electronic processor is configured to operate the autonomous vehicle based on obstacles detected by the plurality of obstacle depth sensors and the obstacle planar sensor.