Alarm Event Data Processing for AI-Assisted False-Alarm Filtering

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing emergency notification systems, particularly 9-1-1 systems, face inefficiencies in accurately identifying and dispatching first responders due to reliance on outdated landline technology and limited contextual information, leading to potential false positives and delayed responses.

Innovation Solution

A case management server integrates with residential devices like smart home security cameras to analyze multimedia data feeds, using facial recognition and calendar data to confirm authorized individuals, and provides a rapid-response interface for PSAPs, allowing human operators to verify and expedite emergency responses.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional 9-1-1 systems are used with landline technology, then system simplicity is maintained, but response accuracy and speed deteriorate due to limited contextual information

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveemergency identification accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple data sources including call data, geolocation data, motion data, imaging system data, and smart home system data into a unified emergency notification system. This integration allows the system to process comprehensive contextual information from diverse sources to accurately identify and respond to emergencies, resolving the contradiction between improved accuracy and system complexity by systematically merging previously separate systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system is designed to handle multiple types of emergencies and process various data formats from different sources through a unified platform. The case management server can process alarm data records from multiple sources including smart home systems, mobile devices, and traditional alarm systems, making the system universally applicable across different emergency scenarios while maintaining consistent processing accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Productivity

If AI systems are deployed for automated threat detection, then processing speed is improved, but classification accuracy worsens due to lack of contextual information

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethreat detection speedVSAvoidthreat classification accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback loops where alarm data records are processed, analyzed, and used to refine future threat detection. The case management server continuously receives alarm data, processes it through the workflow, and uses the results to improve subsequent classifications. This feedback mechanism allows the system to maintain high processing speed while improving classification accuracy over time through learned patterns from processed data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary processing and filtering of alarm data records before they reach the final classification stage. The case management server pre-processes incoming data, organizing it into structured formats and extracting key features, which prepares the data for faster and more accurate AI classification. This preliminary action reduces the computational burden on the classification algorithms while maintaining high accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If confirmation processes are implemented to avoid false positives, then response accuracy is improved, but response time deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefalse positive reductionVSAvoidemergency response time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements selective confirmation processes rather than requiring full confirmation for all alarms. The case management server analyzes alarm data records and determines the level of confirmation needed based on the nature and severity of the detected threat. For high-confidence detections with clear contextual evidence, the system can proceed with minimal or no confirmation, while lower-confidence alarms receive appropriate verification. This partial action approach maintains reliability by reducing false positives without unnecessarily delaying critical emergency responses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12374211B2Systems and methods for alarm event data record processing
Publication Date: 2025.07.29 NOONLIGHT INC
  • US12374211B2 patent drawing
  • US12374211B2 patent drawing
  • US12374211B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Improved systems and methods for providing a notification of an emergent condition using automation, artificial intelligence, visual recognition, and other logic to automatically suggest identifications and classifications of information in audiovisual or other multimedia data about an emergency or alarm and modify a rapid-response display and/or alarm handling workflow to expedite the dispatch of first responds to true emergencies and quickly filter and eliminate false alarms to reduce waste.