Alarm Pattern Handling for Nuisance Suppression in Process Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Industrial process control systems face challenges with alarm overloading due to the generation of numerous nuisance alarms, which overwhelm operators and can lead to the neglect of true alarms, posing safety and efficiency risks.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for alarm handling that detects alarm events, matches them with stored patterns based on historical data, and generates control signals for response events, including suppression of redundant alarms and prediction of consequential events, to reduce alarm load and enhance operator focus on critical alerts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional alarm systems monitor all process parameters, then comprehensive safety monitoring is achieved, but alarm overloading occurs with numerous nuisance alarms overwhelming operators

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety monitoringVSAvoidoperator workload
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The alarm system segments alarms into different categories (nuisance alarms vs. critical alarms) using pattern recognition. By dividing the alarm stream into distinct groups based on historical patterns and co-occurrence analysis, the system allows operators to focus on critical segments while automated processes handle nuisance segments, resolving the contradiction between comprehensive monitoring and operator workload.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary layer between the process parameters and operators: an automated alarm management system that analyzes alarm patterns, identifies nuisance alarms through machine learning, and suppresses or groups them before presenting information to operators. This intermediary filters the alarm stream while maintaining safety monitoring, reducing operator workload without compromising reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of information

If all alarm events are presented to operators, then complete information availability is achieved, but operator attention is分散ed and critical alarms may be missed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation availabilityVSAvoidresponse time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of alarm events using pre-trained machine learning models and historical pattern databases before presenting alarms to operators. By pre-processing alarms to identify nuisance patterns, co-occurring alarm sequences, and suppressible events, the system prepares filtered information in advance, ensuring critical alarms are immediately visible while reducing the overall alarm count that requires operator attention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops where operator responses to alarms are captured and used to refine the machine learning models. This feedback mechanism continuously improves the distinction between nuisance and critical alarms, enhancing information filtering accuracy over time and reducing response time for genuine critical events while maintaining complete information availability for safety-critical alarms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If historical alarm data is analyzed in detail, then accurate pattern recognition is achieved, but processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepattern recognition accuracyVSAvoiddata processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial analysis to historical alarm data by using sampling techniques and incremental learning approaches. Instead of re-processing entire historical datasets continuously, the system processes data incrementally as new alarms arrive, using pre-trained models for rapid classification. This partial processing approach maintains high pattern recognition accuracy while significantly reducing computational time and resources compared to exhaustive analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11887465B2Methods, systems, and computer programs for alarm handling
Publication Date: 2024.01.30 YOKOGAWA ELECTRIC CORP
  • US11887465B2 patent drawing
  • US11887465B2 patent drawing
  • US11887465B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method comprises identifying an alarm event pattern within a log of alarm events that occur within a process control system, determining that a current alarm event within the process control system belongs to the alarm event pattern, determining one or more actions for resolving the current alarm event based on the alarm event pattern, and implementing the one or more actions to resolve the current alarm event.