Process Control Alarm Sequence Prediction for Alarm Floods

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Industrial process control systems face challenges in efficiently handling large numbers of alarms, leading to alarm floods, where operators struggle to perceive and manage multiple alerts, often caused by a single disturbance, and are distracted by nuisance or repeated alarms, which can compromise safety and efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that analyze historical data using data mining algorithms to identify alarm sequences, allowing operators to anticipate and prepare for upcoming alarms by displaying expected future alarms within the sequence, providing strategic guidance and enabling proactive measures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If operators handle alarms one by one in the order they appear on a common alarm list, then the alarm handling follows a simple sequential process, but the operator cannot perceive and handle large numbers of alarms efficiently, leading to alarm floods and reduced safety

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealarm handling processVSAvoidalarm handling efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by analyzing historical alarm data and predicting future alarm sequences before they occur. The prediction module generates anticipated alarm sequences based on patterns from historical data, allowing operators to prepare in advance rather than reactively handling alarms as they occur. This transforms the passive sequential handling into an active preparedness state.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adapts the alarm presentation and handling approach based on real-time conditions. The prediction module continuously analyzes incoming alarms against historical patterns and dynamically generates updated alarm sequences. The interface dynamically presents predicted sequences to operators, allowing the system to adapt to varying process conditions and alarm rates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If operators rely on experience and knowledge to correlate alarms during alarm floods, then some pattern recognition may occur, but the process is slow and distracted by nuisance alarms and repeated sequences

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealarm correlation accuracyVSAvoidtime to handle alarm floods
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by continuously monitoring current alarm sequences and comparing them against historical patterns. The prediction module receives feedback from incoming alarms and adjusts its predictions accordingly. When a predicted alarm sequence matches the actual sequence, the system provides feedback to the operator, confirming the pattern recognition and enabling faster response.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces the manual mechanical process of operator experience-based correlation with an automated computational system. The prediction module uses data mining algorithms and pattern recognition techniques to automatically correlate alarms, eliminating the need for operators to manually analyze and correlate each alarm based on their experience.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Loss of information

If the system displays all current alarms in a common list, then all alarm information is presented to the operator, but the operator is overwhelmed and cannot prioritize effectively among numerous alarms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealarm information completenessVSAvoidoperator workload
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the alarm information into distinct groups: current active alarms, predicted future alarm sequences, and historical pattern data. Instead of presenting all alarms as a single undifferentiated list, the interface separates alarms by their temporal and causal relationships, allowing operators to focus on the most relevant information while still having access to complete alarm data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system adds a temporal dimension to alarm presentation by displaying predicted future alarm sequences alongside current alarms. This creates a time-based organization where operators can see not only what alarms are currently active but also what alarms are likely to occur next, enabling proactive prioritization based on temporal progression rather than just current state.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS10901406B2Method of monitoring and controlling an industrial process, and a process control system
Publication Date: 2021.01.26 ABB (SCHWEIZ) AG
  • US10901406B2 patent drawing
  • US10901406B2 patent drawing
  • US10901406B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of monitoring and controlling an industrial process is provided. The method may be performed in process control system and includes: issuing, in the process control system, a first alarm; determining, in the process control system, at least a first sequence of alarms which the first alarm is part of; and displaying, on a display means, at least a second alarm expected to follow the first alarm at a future point in time, the second alarm being part of the at least first sequence of alarms. A process control system is also provided, and a computer program and a computer program product.