Alarm Sorting via Directed Graph Topology

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current alarm sorting methods in process and manufacturing plants are inaccurate due to time-stamping issues, leading to high alarm rates, operator overload, and unnecessary shut-downs, as time stamps can be imprecise and inconsistent across different plant devices and subsystems.

Innovation Solution

A method using a directed graph to sort alarm messages based on flow direction, eliminating the need for time-stamping by associating alarm messages with alarm areas and generating an ordered list that identifies the root cause alarm, thereby reducing operator workload and improving response time.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If alarm messages are sorted by time-stamp, then the sorting method is simple to implement, but the sorting accuracy deteriorates due to time-stamp imprecision and inconsistency across different plant devices and subsystems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of implementationVSAvoidsorting accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the time-stamp-based sorting mechanism with a topology-based sorting mechanism using directed graphs. Instead of relying on temporal data (time-stamps), the system uses structural data (alarm-area topology and flow direction) to determine alarm priority, thereby eliminating the precision problems associated with time-stamping while maintaining implementation simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary sorting mechanism that uses alarm-area association and flow direction analysis as a mediator between alarm generation and alarm presentation. This intermediary layer processes alarms through topology-based rules rather than direct time-stamp comparison, resolving the contradiction by providing accurate sorting without requiring precise time-stamps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If multiple plant devices generate alarms simultaneously, then the alarm rate increases providing comprehensive monitoring, but operator overload increases making it difficult to identify the first-up alarm

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemonitoring coverageVSAvoidoperator workload
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the plant into multiple alarm-areas with defined topologies and flow directions. By dividing the monitoring scope into structured segments, the system can process and prioritize alarms within each segment independently using topology-based sorting, thereby maintaining comprehensive monitoring while reducing operator burden through automated priority assignment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary sorting and prioritization of alarms based on alarm-area topology and flow direction before presenting them to the operator. This preliminary action automatically identifies and ranks the first-up alarm and its propagation path, so when multiple alarms occur simultaneously, the operator receives pre-sorted information rather than having to manually evaluate all alarms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Loss of information

If manual evaluation of entire alarm messages is required to identify root cause, then comprehensive analysis is achieved, but response time increases leading to unnecessary shut-downs and production losses

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanalysis completenessVSAvoidresponse time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the directed graph topology and flow direction information continuously guide the alarm sorting process. The system uses the predefined alarm-area structures to automatically trace alarm propagation paths and identify root causes, providing continuous feedback that eliminates the need for manual evaluation while maintaining complete analysis through automated topology-based reasoning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary identification of root cause alarms and propagation paths using topology-based sorting before the operator needs to respond. By pre-processing alarms through the directed graph structure, the system automatically determines the first-up alarm and its relationship to other alarms, providing immediate root cause identification without requiring manual analysis of entire alarm messages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10831748B2Optimized method for sorting alarms
Publication Date: 2020.11.10 ABB (SCHWEIZ) AG
  • US10831748B2 patent drawing
  • US10831748B2 patent drawing
  • US10831748B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for sorting alarm-messages of a plant having at least one alarm-area each having at least two plant-devices connected by at least one connection, wherein the at least one alarm-area is defined so that the plant-devices and the respective connection provide a directed graph, involves: providing at least one database containing alarm-data and topology-data; wherein the topology-data describe a directed graph having at least one connection with a related flow direction between the respective plant-devices of the respective assigned alarm-area; generating at least one partly complete first alarm-order of the alarm-messages of the at least one alarm-area by sorting the alarm-messages according to the flow direction of the directed graph.