Industrial Alarm Tuning Analytics for Chattering Alarm Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional industrial alarm systems often suffer from inefficient configurations leading to excessive 'chattering alarms,' which result in inefficiencies and potential damage to industrial assets, requiring significant manual effort and expertise to analyze and tune, making it a time-consuming and labor-intensive process.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for providing prescriptive recommendations on alarm configuration parameters using alarm analytics, which includes analyzing historical and real-time alarm data to simulate alarm counts and predict reductions, thereby optimizing alarm settings and reducing excessive alarms through an interactive user interface that receives and renders alarm tuning recommendations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional alarm systems are configured with multiple alarm parameters, then alarm coverage is improved, but alarm rate increases leading to chattering alarms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealarm coverageVSAvoidalarm rate
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts alarm configuration parameters (such as alarm thresholds, deadbands, and suppression settings) based on simulated alarm count predictions. By changing these parameters iteratively, the system optimizes the balance between maintaining adequate alarm coverage and reducing excessive alarm rates that cause chattering alarms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses simulated alarm count data as feedback to automatically adjust alarm configurations. The simulation engine predicts alarm rates based on current configurations and process data, and this feedback is used to refine parameter settings, creating a closed-loop system that continuously optimizes alarm performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If manual analysis and tuning of alarm systems is performed, then alarm configuration accuracy is improved, but time consumption and labor intensity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealarm configuration accuracyVSAvoidtuning time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs automatic alarm tuning by simulating alarm counts and generating optimization recommendations without requiring manual expert analysis. The simulation engine and recommendation engine work autonomously to analyze process data, evaluate configuration options, and suggest optimal settings, eliminating the need for time-consuming manual tuning while maintaining high configuration accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual expert analysis and mechanical tuning processes with automated computational simulation and algorithmic optimization. The simulation engine uses historical and real-time process data to model alarm behavior, substituting human expertise with automated analytical capabilities that are both faster and more consistent.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Productivity

If alarm suppression settings are adjusted to reduce chattering alarms, then operational efficiency is improved, but alarm reliability may deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoidalarm reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial suppression actions selectively to specific alarm sources that are generating chattering behavior, rather than applying blanket suppression across all alarms. By targeting only the excessive alarms identified through simulation analysis, the system reduces operational inefficiencies while preserving the reliability of genuine alarm signals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies different suppression strategies to different alarm sources based on their individual characteristics and contribution to chattering. Rather than uniform suppression, the system tailors suppression settings locally to each alarm generator, maintaining appropriate alarm reliability for critical functions while suppressing only the problematic chattering alarms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20240061416A1Alarm analytics for prescriptive recommendations of configuration parameters for industrial process alarms
Publication Date: 2024.02.22 HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
  • US20240061416A1 patent drawing
  • US20240061416A1 patent drawing
  • US20240061416A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Various embodiments described herein relate to alarm analytics for providing prescriptive recommendations of configuration parameters for industrial process alarms. In this regard, a request to obtain alarm tuning recommendation data for one or more alarm configuration parameters related to one or more industrial processes in an industrial environment is transmitted to a server system in response to an action performed with respect to a first user interface configuration for an interactive user interface. In response to the request, the alarm tuning recommendation data is received from the server system. The alarm tuning recommendation data is configured based at least on alarm insight data associated with respective alarm count reduction predictions for the one or more alarm configuration parameters. Additionally, the first user interface configuration for the interactive user interface is altered based on the alarm tuning recommendation data to provide a second user interface configuration for the interactive user interface.