Atomic Layer Etching Tungsten Halide Plasma Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional etching methods for tungsten and cobalt in semiconductor fabrication face challenges such as lack of precise control, surface roughness, and poor etch selectivity, particularly in advanced logic and memory applications where feature sizes are small and uniformity is critical.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of atomic layer etching (ALE) using halide chemistry to form a modified surface layer, followed by exposure to a plasma with controlled bias voltage, allowing for precise removal of the modified layer with directional control and minimal surface damage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional etching methods are used for tungsten and cobalt, then etching can be performed, but precise etch control and uniformity are poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveetch control and uniformityVSAvoidetch selectivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The etching process is divided into two distinct sequential steps: (1) surface modification by exposing to halide chemistry to form a modified surface layer, and (2) removal of the modified layer by plasma exposure with bias voltage. This segmentation allows each step to be independently optimized, achieving precise control over etch depth and rate while improving selectivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Before the actual etching step, the metal surface is pre-modified by exposure to halide chemistry (e.g., chlorine-containing plasma or gas) to form a halide-containing surface layer. This preliminary action creates a chemically distinct layer that is more susceptible to subsequent plasma removal, enabling precise etch control and improved selectivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Manufacturing precision

If conventional etching is used, then metal can be removed, but surface roughness increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface smoothnessVSAvoidsurface roughness
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The process uses controlled parameter changes including maintaining substrate temperature below 150°C during halide exposure to prevent spontaneous etching, applying specific bias voltage ranges (50-80 Vb) during plasma removal, and controlling plasma power and pressure. These parameter optimizations ensure smooth surface finish while achieving desired etch depth.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Length of moving object

If feature sizes are reduced for advanced devices, then device scaling is achieved, but filling becomes harder and etch control becomes more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeature sizeVSAvoidfill control and etch uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of moving objectVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The halide modification step is self-limiting, forming a surface layer of controlled thickness that naturally stops growing after monolayer coverage. This self-service characteristic provides inherent control over etch depth, ensuring uniformity even in sub-20nm features without requiring complex external control mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Productivity

If plasma exposure is increased to improve etch rate, then productivity increases, but surface damage and re-deposition increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveetch rateVSAvoidsurface damage and re-deposition
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The halide-containing surface layer acts as an intermediary between the metal substrate and the plasma removal step. This intermediate layer allows plasma to remove material efficiently while protecting the underlying metal from direct plasma damage, reducing surface roughness and minimizing re-deposition of etch products.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

ALE provides precise etch control down to atomic levels, achieving uniformity within 1 nm and reducing surface roughness, enabling effective etching of tungsten, cobalt, and their nitrides with improved selectivity and reduced re-deposition of etch products.

Implementation Method 1

exposing a surface of the metal to a halide chemistry to form a modified halide-containing surface layer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical reaction: Chemical Bonding

Implementation Method 2

applying a bias voltage to the substrate while exposing the modified halide-containing surface layer to a plasma to thereby remove the modified halide-containing surface layer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPlasma: Plasma

Implementation Method 3

applying a bias voltage to the substrate while exposing the modified halide-containing surface layer to a plasma

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectIon bombardment: Ion Beam

Data Source

PatentUS10096487B2Atomic layer etching of tungsten and other metals
Publication Date: 2018.10.09 LAM RES CORP
  • US10096487B2 patent drawing
  • US10096487B2 patent drawing
  • US10096487B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided herein are methods of atomic layer etching (ALE) of metals including tungsten (W) and cobalt (Co). The methods disclosed herein provide precise etch control down to the atomic level, with etching a low as 1 Å to 10 Å per cycle in some embodiments. In some embodiments, directional control is provided without damage to the surface of interest. The methods may include cycles of a modification operation to form a reactive layer, followed by a removal operation to etch only this modified layer. The modification is performed without spontaneously etching the surface of the metal.