Alert Cluster Analysis for Reducing Alert Overload

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing alert management systems generate excessive volumes of alerts, leading to alert overload and fatigue, which can result in errors and potential service outages, particularly in service-oriented platforms with numerous interdependent services and microservices.

Innovation Solution

Implement an alert cluster analysis apparatus that groups alerts into clusters based on features using a clustering model, determines significance scores, and outputs policy change recommendations when certain clusters satisfy an insignificance threshold, allowing for bulk actions and policy adjustments to reduce alert volume.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If alert management systems generate comprehensive alerts to ensure all service issues are detected, then detection reliability is improved, but alert volume increases causing operator fatigue and errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice issue detection reliabilityVSAvoidalert volume
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments alerts into clusters based on similarity in features such as service name, error type, and temporal proximity. This segmentation allows operators to view consolidated alert clusters rather than individual alerts, reducing the quantity of visible alerts while maintaining detection reliability through structured organization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges similar alerts into unified clusters by identifying common patterns and characteristics. Multiple alerts with similar features are combined into a single alert cluster representation, reducing alert volume while preserving the information content and reliability of issue detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Ease of operation

If alerts are grouped into clusters to reduce alert volume, then ease of operation is improved, but complexity of alert processing increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealert management easeVSAvoidalert processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service through automated clustering algorithms that automatically group alerts based on predefined features and patterns. The system performs feature extraction, similarity calculation, and cluster formation autonomously, reducing the need for manual intervention and simplifying operator tasks while managing processing complexity through automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes parameters by transforming raw alert data into extracted features (such as service identifiers, error codes, temporal patterns) that are used for clustering. This parameter transformation simplifies the alert processing logic by working with normalized feature representations rather than raw alert messages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If feature extraction models are applied to alert clustering, then alert significance scoring accuracy is improved, but computational resources and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealert significance score accuracyVSAvoidcomputational resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by extracting only the most relevant features from alerts (such as service name, error type, severity level) rather than all possible alert attributes. This selective feature extraction maintains sufficient accuracy for significance scoring while reducing computational resource consumption compared to processing all alert data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces complex manual analysis mechanisms with automated machine learning models that perform feature extraction and significance scoring computationally. This substitution reduces the need for complex processing logic and manual intervention, optimizing the balance between scoring accuracy and computational efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS20250322068A1Alert cluster analysis apparatus, method, and computer program product
Publication Date: 2025.10.16 ATLASSIAN PTY LTD
  • US20250322068A1 patent drawing
  • US20250322068A1 patent drawing
  • US20250322068A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Various embodiments disclosed herein are directed to a system, method, apparatus, and/or a computer program product that are configured to programmatically analyze alert clusters and make recommendations to alert managers as to alert policy changes that might reduce alert volume without hindering the intended performance of the alert management system. For example, various embodiments are configured to programmatically determine if a threshold number of alerts within an alert cluster are insignificant and output an alert policy change recommendation interface that is configured to allow alert mangers to execute adjustments to underlying alert policies. In some embodiments, alert policy changes are recommended only when a threshold number of alerts within an alert cluster are insignificant and such threshold number of alerts are determined to be increasing within the monitored software application framework.