Alert Device Dynamic Notification Customization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing alert devices lack flexibility in customizing alert techniques based on specific emergency or non-emergency situations, often requiring reprogramming and may not effectively convey information due to static alert routines and limited interoperability with external devices, leading to potential confusion or safety risks.

Innovation Solution

An alert device with controllable lights and speakers that receive digitally encoded instructions for patterns and durations of activation, allowing dynamic adjustment of alert notifications based on received alerts, enabling customizable and situation-specific alert responses.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a fire alarm uses fixed high-intensity audible and visible alerts to indicate emergency situations, then people can quickly identify the alarm and respond appropriately, but the alarm may cause confusion and panic when triggered for non-fire emergencies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealert accuracyVSAvoidconfusion and panic
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The alert device dynamically adjusts its alerting behavior based on the type of emergency situation. The controller modifies audible and visible alert characteristics (intensity, pattern, duration) according to the specific emergency classification, transitioning from static fixed alerts to adaptive dynamic alerts that match the situation severity and type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes alert parameters such as sound intensity, light brightness, and alert duration based on the emergency type. For example, severe emergencies trigger high-intensity alerts while less critical situations use lower-intensity patterns, allowing the same device to convey different urgency levels without causing unnecessary panic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If separate alert devices are administered for each type of alert situation, then each device can be optimized for its specific function, but the system becomes inefficient and impractical to manage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealert effectivenessVSAvoidnumber of devices
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A single alert device is designed to handle multiple types of emergency situations through programmable controllers that can be configured for different alert scenarios. The device receives various alert signals and automatically adapts its response, replacing the need for separate dedicated devices for each emergency type while maintaining appropriate alert effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The alert device autonomously determines its own alerting behavior by receiving emergency type information and automatically selecting appropriate alert patterns. The controller processes the alert signal, identifies the emergency type, and self-configures the audible and visible alerts without requiring manual reconfiguration or multiple specialized devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If alert devices use static alert routines, then the device structure remains simple, but the device cannot effectively convey information for different emergency types

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealert customizationVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The controller is pre-programmed with various alert routines and patterns that can be automatically selected based on the received alert signal. Instead of requiring real-time complex decision-making, the system has pre-prepared alert configurations that are rapidly deployed based on the emergency type, balancing adaptability with operational simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Loss of information

If alert devices provide detailed information about emergency types, then users can respond more appropriately, but the alert may not be noticed if information is conveyed too slowly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveemergency type informationVSAvoidinformation conveyance speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The alert device uses periodic alert patterns that repeat information at intervals. The controller cycles through audible and visible alerts in structured patterns, repeatedly conveying emergency type information over time. This periodic repetition ensures that detailed information is both conveyed completely and noticed effectively, as the repeating patterns maintain attention while delivering comprehensive information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS7889092B2Alert device having notification-based customizable settings
Publication Date: 2011.02.15 ALERTUS TECHNOLOGIES LLC
  • US7889092B2 patent drawing
  • US7889092B2 patent drawing
  • US7889092B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An alert device is disclosed. The alert device has at least one light, at least one speaker, and a communication system configured to receive an alert notification containing instructions for each of at least one pattern and duration of activation of the at least one light, at least one pattern and duration of activation of the at least one speaker, and an overall duration of the alert notification. The alert device further has a controller communicatively coupled with the at least one light, the at least one speaker, and the communication system. The controller is configured to monitor the communication system for the alert notification, decode the alert notification, activate the at least one light and the at least one speaker for their respective at least one patterns and durations of activation, and deactivate the at least one light and the at least one speaker after the overall duration elapses.