Alert Management Module for IT Support Automation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Large organizations face challenges in managing the high volume of alerts generated by event monitoring systems, leading to significant time spent by IT support teams in reviewing and creating issue tickets, with existing systems often sending unnecessary notifications and lacking efficient automation.

Innovation Solution

An alert management module that processes alerts based on a predefined alert ruleset, automatically determining whether to notify IT support teams, creating issue tickets, and discarding duplicates, while configuring priorities and secondary conditions to filter relevant alerts and reduce manual effort.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If event monitoring systems generate alerts for all computing resource issues, then system reliability is improved, but the volume of alerts increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem reliabilityVSAvoidalert volume
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes duplicate or low-priority alerts from the alert stream before they reach IT support teams. The system identifies redundant alerts that arise from the same underlying issue and filters them out, keeping only unique or high-priority notifications. This reduces the overall quantity of alerts while preserving the reliability function of monitoring system health.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Measurement precision

If IT support teams review all generated alerts manually, then measurement precision of issues is improved, but loss of time increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveissue identification accuracyVSAvoidtime for reviewing alerts
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service automation where the alert management module automatically processes alerts by comparing them against a ruleset, identifying duplicates, and determining which alerts require human review. This automated preprocessing reduces the time IT support teams spend on manual review while maintaining precision through structured evaluation criteria.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-processing alerts before they reach human reviewers. The system performs initial analysis, duplicate detection, and priority classification automatically, so that when IT support team members do review alerts, they are reviewing pre-filtered, high-value information. This preliminary automation maintains measurement precision while dramatically reducing time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of operation

If manual creation of issue tickets is required for each alert, then ease of operation is improved, but productivity decreases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanual controlVSAvoidalert processing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The alert management module performs self-service by automatically creating issue tickets based on the ruleset evaluation. When an alert is determined to require human attention, the system autonomously generates the corresponding issue ticket in the issue tracking system, eliminating the need for manual ticket creation and significantly improving productivity while maintaining operational control through configurable rules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary alert management module that sits between the event monitoring system and the issue tracking system. This intermediary automatically translates alerts into issue tickets according to predefined rules, acting as a mediator that improves productivity by handling the translation process automatically while preserving the connection between monitoring and tracking systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Reliability

If all alerts are processed and notified to IT support teams, then reliability of issue tracking is improved, but use of energy and computing resources increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveissue tracking completenessVSAvoidcomputing resource usage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and removes unnecessary duplicate alerts from the processing pipeline before they consume computing resources. By identifying and filtering out redundant notifications that would otherwise be processed, stored, and potentially acted upon, the system maintains reliable issue tracking for unique problems while significantly reducing energy and computing resource consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS9716613B2Automated alert management
Publication Date: 2017.07.25 BANK OF AMERICA CORP
  • US9716613B2 patent drawing
  • US9716613B2 patent drawing
  • US9716613B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Alerts may be received from an event monitoring system that monitors computing resources of a computer system. Based on an alert ruleset, an alert management module may determine whether to provide notification of the alert. If the alert management module decides to provide notification of the alert, then the alert management module may initiate the creation of an issue ticket corresponding to the alert in an issue tracking system. If the alert management module decides not to provide notification of the alert, then the alert management module may discard the alert.