Alert Management Root Cause Identification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In data centers, multiple alerts triggered by interconnected components can lead to information overload and redundant responses, as a single incident can cause a cascade of faults across different components, wasting resources and requiring inefficient investigation of secondary alerts.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and system that identifies the root cause of alerts by determining correlations between alerts using predetermined rules or a time-aware Bayesian system, allowing for the suppression or prediction of downstream alerts and focusing resources on the primary fault.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If multiple alerts are generated for each fault in interconnected components, then comprehensive monitoring coverage is improved, but information overload and redundant responses increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemonitoring coverageVSAvoidinformation overload
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple related alerts into a single consolidated alert by identifying causal relationships between faults in interconnected components. The system combines alerts that stem from the same root cause into one unified notification, reducing information overload while maintaining comprehensive monitoring coverage through the correlation analysis module.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts the root cause alert from among multiple related alerts and separates it as the primary notification. By identifying and extracting the causal alert that originates the cascade of faults, the system allows operators to focus on the root cause rather than responding to all downstream effects individually.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Measurement precision

If individual alerts are investigated separately, then complete fault analysis is achieved, but response time and resource consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault analysis completenessVSAvoidresponse time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary correlation analysis between alerts before they reach the operator. The system pre-establishes causal relationships and groupings of related alerts, so that when alerts arrive, the root cause has already been identified in advance, enabling faster response without sacrificing analysis completeness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where the correlation analysis continuously learns from historical data to improve its ability to identify causal relationships. The system refines its alert grouping based on observed patterns, enabling more accurate root cause identification over time while reducing the manual investigation required for each alert.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If all alerts are addressed individually, then thorough response is ensured, but redundant actions and resource wastage increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse thoroughnessVSAvoidresource wastage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple alerts that result from the same root cause into a single response action. By combining alerts into consolidated notifications based on causal relationships, the system ensures thorough response to all faults while eliminating redundant actions that would occur if each alert were addressed separately.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the harmful effect of cascade faults (which cause multiple redundant alerts) into a beneficial grouping mechanism. The causal relationships that initially create alert redundancy are used as the basis for intelligent alert consolidation, turning what was a problem into the foundation for efficient resource allocation and targeted response.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Data Source

PatentUS8890676B1Alert management
Publication Date: 2014.11.18 GOOGLE LLC
  • US8890676B1 patent drawing
  • US8890676B1 patent drawing
  • US8890676B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A first alert and a second alert are received. The first alert indicates a first fault related to a first component of the multiple components and the second alert that indicates a second fault related to a second component of the multiple components. The first component affects the second component such that the first fault caused the second fault. A correlation between the first alert and the second alert is determined and, based on the determined correlation, a determination is made that the first fault is a root cause of the first alert and the second alert. An indication that the first fault is the root cause of the first alert and second alert is provided.