Alertness Services Dynamic Notification Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current computing devices lack the ability to adapt notification presentation based on a user's actual alertness level, often delivering unwanted notifications that can disrupt sleep or concentration.

Innovation Solution

A method that involves receiving interaction data from users, such as biometric, inertia, and software-usage data, to determine an alertness inference, which is then used to alter the presentation of messages, including withholding or modifying notifications to suit the user's alertness state.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If do-not-disturb settings are used to withhold notifications at certain times, then sleep disruption is reduced, but notifications may be withheld even when the user is alert and able to receive them

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesleep disruptionVSAvoidnotification delivery
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors user interaction data (typing speed, scroll behavior, app switching frequency) and uses this feedback to dynamically adjust notification delivery. This allows the system to adapt to the user's actual alertness state rather than relying on fixed time-based rules, resolving the contradiction by ensuring notifications are delivered when the user is alert while still protecting sleep time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The notification system transitions from static, time-based do-not-disturb settings to a dynamic system that adjusts notification behavior in real-time based on monitored user interactions. The system continuously evaluates interaction metrics and modifies notification delivery accordingly, allowing it to adapt to changing alertness levels throughout the day and night.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of operation

If notifications are delivered based on fixed time schedules, then implementation is simple, but notification relevance to user alertness state is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenotification deliveryVSAvoidalertness adaptation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically monitors user interaction patterns and makes intelligent decisions about notification delivery without requiring manual configuration or user input. The device serves itself by analyzing its own usage data and autonomously adjusting notification behavior, maintaining ease of operation while achieving sophisticated adaptability to user alertness states.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameters used for notification delivery from fixed time-based parameters to dynamic parameters derived from real-time interaction data analysis. By monitoring metrics such as typing speed, scroll rate, and app switching frequency, the system adjusts notification delivery parameters adaptively, achieving both simplicity and sophistication.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If interaction data monitoring is implemented to determine alertness, then notification relevance improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealertness detectionVSAvoiddata processing
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses existing multi-functional components already present in modern devices (camera for eye tracking, microphone for voice activity, motion sensors for device handling) to gather alertness indicators. By leveraging these existing sensors for dual purposes (original function plus alertness detection), the system achieves sophisticated alertness monitoring without adding significant hardware complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces complex mechanical or hardware-based alertness detection with software-based analysis of existing interaction data. Instead of adding specialized sensors or hardware, the system uses algorithms to analyze patterns in normal device usage data, substituting computational complexity for hardware complexity while achieving the same goal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS20230165498A1Alertness Services
Publication Date: 2023.06.01 RESMED SENSOR TECH LTD
  • US20230165498A1 patent drawing
  • US20230165498A1 patent drawing
  • US20230165498A1 patent drawing

AI summary

User alertness can be monitored and leveraged while the user is interacting with a computing device, such as a mobile device (e.g., a smartphone or tablet). By monitoring interaction data, an alertness inference of the user can be generated. The interaction data can include biometric data of the user (e.g., blink rate, eye focus, and breathing rate), inertia data of the device (e.g., swaying and orientation), and software-usage data of the device (e.g., button press speed and accuracy, app or action being used, and response times). The alertness inference can be a score measuring a degree of alertness of the user, from a deep sleep through fully alert. The alertness inference can be leveraged to automatically alert presentation of a message (e.g., notification) on the device, such as withholding presentation of the message or presenting it in different fashion (e.g., silently).