Alertness-Based Task Allocation for Machine Operator Fatigue

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Users operating machinery, such as vehicles, face cognitive burdens due to decision-making demands and fatigue, which can lead to increased response times and reduced safety, as existing technologies do not effectively manage alertness levels and workload dynamics.

Innovation Solution

A system that utilizes sensors to monitor user alertness levels, predicts required alertness for future tasks, and provides tailored notifications to ensure users are adequately engaged, adjusting tasks or operations to mitigate fatigue and enhance safety.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If automation is increased to relieve users of task burden, then productivity is improved, but reliability deteriorates due to untracked cognitive burden and fatigue

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask automation levelVSAvoiduser decision-making reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors user alertness levels through sensor data (eye tracking, heart rate, galvanic skin response) and provides feedback to dynamically adjust task allocation. This closed-loop feedback mechanism ensures that automation levels are adapted based on real-time cognitive state, preventing reliability degradation while maintaining high productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system predicts future alertness levels and required alertness for upcoming tasks in advance, allowing proactive task reallocation before cognitive degradation impacts performance. By performing preliminary assessment and planning, the system prevents reliability issues rather than reacting to them.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If mitigation techniques are applied to reduce cognitive burden, then reliability is improved, but device complexity increases due to additional tracking requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser performance reliabilityVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses multi-functional sensors that simultaneously track multiple physiological parameters (eye movement, heart rate, skin conductance) to assess cognitive state. This universal monitoring approach improves reliability without proportionally increasing complexity, as single sensors serve multiple measurement purposes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically processes sensor data through machine learning models to determine alertness levels and task allocation decisions without requiring manual intervention or complex configuration. The automated self-service nature of the monitoring and decision-making process minimizes operational complexity while maintaining high reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If user engagement is increased to improve decision-making, then reliability is improved, but loss of time increases due to additional monitoring and notification overhead

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecision-making qualityVSAvoidresponse time overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary prediction of future alertness levels and required task engagement, allowing proactive preparation and minimization of reactive interventions. By anticipating needs in advance, the system reduces time loss associated with emergency notifications and reactive task management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the level of monitoring and notification frequency based on current and predicted alertness states. When users are sufficiently engaged, monitoring intensity is reduced to minimize time overhead, while maintaining reliability through selective, targeted interventions only when necessary.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11039771B1Apparatuses and methods for managing tasks in accordance with alertness levels and thresholds
Publication Date: 2021.06.22 AT&T INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY I L P
  • US11039771B1 patent drawing
  • US11039771B1 patent drawing
  • US11039771B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Aspects of the subject disclosure may include, for example, obtaining data from a plurality of sensors at a first point in time, analyzing the data to identify a first level of alertness of a user, predicting a second level of alertness that is required by the user to operate a machine at a second point in time that is subsequent to the first point in time, comparing the first level of alertness to the second level of alertness to generate a first comparison result, identifying a first type of a first notification based on the first comparison result, identifying a third point in time to provide the first notification based on the first comparison result, wherein the third point in time is subsequent to the first point in time and prior to the second point in time, and providing the first notification at the third point in time. Other embodiments are disclosed.