Algorithm Chaining for Object Detection Efficiency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current object detection technologies face challenges in efficiently and accurately locating objects in vast geographic areas, such as during the Malaysian Boeing 777-200ER airliner disappearance, due to high costs, limited search time, and inefficient processing of large data sets, with traditional ISR techniques and crowd sourcing methods having drawbacks like accessibility issues and potential cyberattacks.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and system that selects and orders a subset of algorithms based on cumulative trained probability of correctness and conditional probability to reduce processing load, using a chain of algorithms to selectively cull source data and improve object detection efficiency, with stochastic math models and discrete event simulators to compute confidence levels and optimize algorithm chains.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Area of stationary object

If traditional ISR techniques and crowd sourcing methods are used to locate objects in vast geographic areas, then coverage area is improved, but processing time and resource consumption increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoverage areaVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the vast geographic search area into multiple zones and processes images in parallel across distributed computing resources. The system divides the 24,000 sq. km search area into manageable segments that can be processed simultaneously, reducing overall processing time while maintaining comprehensive coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements preliminary filtering and preprocessing of images before full analysis. Automated algorithms perform initial object detection and filtering on incoming images, pre-processing data to identify potential targets of interest before human analysts review them, significantly reducing the time required to process vast numbers of images.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If more manpower and technology are applied to identify objects, then detection capability is improved, but processing load and resource consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection capabilityVSAvoidprocessing load
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces automated algorithms and machine learning models as intermediaries between raw image data and human analyst review. These intermediary systems perform initial detection, filtering, and prioritization of images, reducing the processing load on human analysts while maintaining or improving detection capability through automated pattern recognition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual image review processes with automated computer-based algorithms for initial detection and filtering. This substitution of mechanical human labor with automated systems reduces processing load on human resources while enhancing detection capability through consistent, scalable automated analysis of large image volumes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Loss of information

If conventional data processing methods are used for Big Data, then data analysis capability is improved, but processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata analysis capabilityVSAvoidcomputational resources
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSUse of energy by stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial processing by focusing computational resources on analyzing only those images and data elements that contain potential targets of interest, rather than processing all available data uniformly. The system performs selective analysis on subsets of data identified as relevant, reducing overall computational resource consumption while maintaining comprehensive data analysis capability for critical elements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS10460252B2System and method of chaining algorithms for global object recognition to improve probability of correctness and reduce processing load
Publication Date: 2019.10.29 RAYTHEON CO
  • US10460252B2 patent drawing
  • US10460252B2 patent drawing
  • US10460252B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method improves the probability of correctly detecting an object from a collection of source data and reduces the processing load. A plurality of algorithms for a given data type are selected and ordered based on a cumulative trained probability of correctness (Pc) that each of the algorithms, which are processed in a chain and conditioned upon the result of the preceding algorithms, produce a correct result and a processing. The algorithms cull the source data to pass forward a reduced subset of source data in which the conditional probability of detecting the object is higher than the a priori probability of the algorithm detecting that same object. The Pc and its confidence interval is suitably computed and displayed for each algorithm and the chain and the final object detection.