Aligned Editorial Correction Database for Non-Native Language Proofing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current proofing tools are inadequate for non-native language speakers as they fail to address complex combinations of grammar, lexical, and idiomatic errors, and are not easily customizable for different language backgrounds and skill levels.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for providing aligned editorial corrections by receiving and organizing text into sentences, creating a second edited text, and aligning it with the original to create a data structure that can be used to train proofing tools, allowing for tailored feedback.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional proofing tools are used to correct texts by non-native language speakers, then individual grammar errors can be detected, but complex combinations of multiple error types (grammar, lexical, idiomatic) cannot be reliably corrected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror detection accuracyVSAvoidcapability to handle multiple error types
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the proofing task into multiple specialized modules: grammar error detection, lexical error detection, and idiomatic expression detection. Each module handles a specific type of error independently, allowing the system to maintain high accuracy for each error type while collectively handling complex combinations of errors that would be impossible for a single monolithic system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal proofing system that can handle multiple types of errors (grammar, lexical, idiomatic) and accommodate different language backgrounds and skill levels through a single integrated platform. The system uses customizable feedback mechanisms that can be adapted to various user needs, making it universally applicable across different linguistic contexts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Ease of operation

If proofing tools are designed for native language speakers, then they can effectively correct individual errors, but they fail to address the challenges of non-native language writers with complex error combinations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproofing effectivenessVSAvoidcustomizability for different language backgrounds
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic customization capabilities where the proofing system can adapt its feedback mechanisms based on the user's language background and skill level. The system allows users to customize the type and amount of feedback they receive, making the proofing process effective and accessible across different linguistic contexts and user expertise levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes key parameters of the proofing system including feedback granularity, correction suggestions, and error prioritization based on user profiles and language backgrounds. By dynamically adjusting these parameters, the system maintains ease of operation for users while becoming adaptable to different linguistic contexts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If existing grammar checkers are used, then basic grammar errors can be corrected, but they are brittle and difficult to customize for different language backgrounds and skill levels

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegrammar correction reliabilityVSAvoidcustomization complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the correction system into modular components that can be independently configured for different language backgrounds and skill levels. This modular architecture maintains reliable grammar correction while simplifying customization, as users can selectively enable or adjust specific correction modules without reconfiguring the entire system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS8078451B2Interface and methods for collecting aligned editorial corrections into a database
Publication Date: 2011.12.13 ZHIGU HLDG
  • US8078451B2 patent drawing
  • US8078451B2 patent drawing
  • US8078451B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for providing aligned editorial corrections to a database is discussed. The method includes receiving a first text in a language and organizing the first text into one or more sentences. The method further includes editing a copy of the first text to create a second text. The second text is in the language of the first text. The method further includes aligning the sentences of the first text with corresponding sentences of the second text storing the aligned sentences on a computer readable medium. A system for providing a data structure having aligned editorial corrections is also discussed. The system includes an alignment component for receiving a first text and organizing the first text into sentences. The system also includes a user interface configured to provide a second text, wherein the second text is an edited version of the first text in the language of the first text.