Alignment Mark Detection Using Waveform Correlativity Evaluation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In semiconductor manufacturing, the alignment of shot areas on a wafer is challenging due to poor overlay accuracy between circuit layers, leading to defective chips and reduced yield, primarily because existing methods struggle to accurately recognize alignment marks in noisy waveform data and require time-consuming adjustments of processing parameters.

Innovation Solution

An evaluation system and method that photoelectrically detects potential positions of alignment marks within waveform data, specifies the most likely positions based on specifying information, and evaluates the search operation to improve mark recognition accuracy by simulating mark recognition operations at designated positions, allowing for parameter adjustments to prevent mark detection errors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If mark recognition operation is performed using waveform data with noise components, then mark detection may fail, but increasing processing parameters adjustment time is required to resolve detection errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemark recognition accuracyVSAvoidparameter adjustment time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs mark recognition operations at multiple potential positions before final detection, extracting candidate positions and evaluating correlativity in advance. This preliminary action at multiple positions prevents detection errors that would require time-consuming parameter adjustments later.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent evaluates correlativity between template waveforms and waveform data at each potential position, using this feedback to determine whether marks are recognized. This feedback mechanism allows automatic identification of detection failures without requiring manual parameter adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If multiple processing parameters are adjusted to improve mark recognition, then detection accuracy may improve, but the complexity of parameter setting increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemark detection accuracyVSAvoidparameter setting complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs self-evaluation of mark recognition operations by automatically calculating correlativity between template waveforms and detected waveforms. This self-service mechanism eliminates the need for complex manual parameter setting and evaluation, as the system automatically identifies detection quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the approach from adjusting multiple processing parameters to evaluating correlativity as a detection metric. By using correlativity values to assess mark recognition quality, the system avoids the complexity of tuning multiple parameters while maintaining high detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If mark search operation is performed at all potential positions, then detection coverage is improved, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemark detection reliabilityVSAvoidsearch operation speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs mark recognition operations at multiple potential positions (excessive action) to ensure reliable detection, then uses correlativity evaluation to identify the most likely position. This approach maintains high reliability while avoiding the need to process all possible positions equally.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts candidate potential positions from waveform data based on characteristics of alignment marks, then focuses recognition operations on these extracted candidates. This extraction approach maintains comprehensive coverage while reducing the total number of positions requiring full processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances the accuracy of mark recognition, reduces mark detection errors, and streamlines the process of adjusting processing parameters, thereby improving the yield and quality of semiconductor devices by facilitating precise alignment and overlay exposure.

Implementation Method 1

a waveform data that represents photoelectric conversion signals corresponding to areas on the wafer including the alignment marks is obtained

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotoelectric conversion: Photoelectric Effect

Data Source

PatentUS7838858B2Evaluation system and method of a search operation that detects a detection subject on an object
Publication Date: 2010.11.23 NIKON CORP
  • US7838858B2 patent drawing
  • US7838858B2 patent drawing
  • US7838858B2 patent drawing

AI summary

First, an operator inputs various parameters required for a mark recognition operation including a designated position coordinate designated via a mouse and a keyboard (step 201). Then, an edge potential position closest to the designated position is selected (step 205), or an edge potential position within a predetermined range having the designated position as a datum is selected (step 207), and a mark recognition operation is performed at the selected edge potential position (step 209). The recognition results are shown on a display (step 211).