Alimentary Scheduling System Using Nutrient Distance Metrics

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing solutions for selecting alimentary provisioning based on physiological dictates often limit sources or selections, leading to frustration and under-utilization, as they fail to effectively manage the multiplicity of possible solutions.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that utilize a computing device to provide an alimentary instruction set, determine per-meal nutrient requirements, receive and rank ingredient combinations from multiple providers based on nutritional matching, and allow user selection to generate a personalized list of ingredient combinations that minimize nutritional distance, enabling iterative refinement of meal schedules.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If multiple alimentary provider devices and ingredient combinations are considered, then the comprehensiveness and personalization of meal planning is improved, but the system complexity and computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepersonalization of meal planningVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the complex task of meal planning into distinct components: receiving ingredient combinations from multiple providers, determining nutrient listings for each combination, calculating distance metrics against target nutrients, and generating ranked lists. This segmentation allows each component to be processed independently, managing system complexity while maintaining comprehensive personalization capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces a new dimension of nutritional analysis by calculating distance metrics between ingredient combinations and target nutrient profiles. This dimensional approach transforms the selection problem from simple provider comparison to multi-dimensional nutritional optimization, enabling personalized meal planning across multiple nutrient parameters simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Measurement precision

If nutrient distance metrics are calculated for all provider ingredient combinations, then the precision of nutritional matching is improved, but the computational time and processing resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenutritional matching precisionVSAvoidcomputational time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by receiving and storing ingredient combinations from all alimentary providers before the actual meal selection process. Nutrient listings are determined in advance for all combinations, and distance metrics are pre-calculated against target nutrients. This preliminary processing organizes data structureally, enabling faster retrieval and ranking when users need meal recommendations, thus reducing real-time computational time while maintaining high precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12009085B2Systems and methods for scheduling alimentary combinations
Publication Date: 2024.06.11 KPN INNOVATIONS LLC
  • US12009085B2 patent drawing
  • US12009085B2 patent drawing
  • US12009085B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for scheduling alimentary combinations includes a computing device configured to provide an alimentary instruction set including a plurality of target nutrient quantities corresponding to a plurality of scheduled meals, determine a per-meal alimentary instruction set as a function of the plurality of target nutrient quantities, receive, from each alimentary provider device of a plurality of alimentary provider devices, a plurality of provider ingredient combinations, generate a ranked list of ingredient combinations as a function of the plurality of provider ingredient combinations, receive a user selection of a provider ingredient combination corresponding to a meal of the plurality of scheduled meals, and generate a modified ranked list of ingredient combinations as a function of the user selection and the alimentary instruction set.