Plastic-Coated Electrode Binder Composition for Alkaline Battery

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional non-sintered positive electrodes for alkaline accumulators face challenges in mechanical strength, self-discharge, and lifespan degradation due to binder oxidation and particle migration, especially under high temperature and permanent charging conditions.

Innovation Solution

A non-sintered positive electrode design featuring a two-dimensional current-conducting support with a binder composition comprising a copolymer of tetrafluoroethylene and propylene, polytetrafluoroethylene, and carboxymethylcellulose, along with optional additives like silane and fibers, to enhance adhesion, mechanical strength, and prevent particle migration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If a two-dimensional conductive support is used to reduce cost, then manufacturing cost is reduced, but mechanical strength and adhesion deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoidmechanical strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a composite binder system combining PTFE (polytetrafluoroethylene) with elastomers (EVA or acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene copolymer) and carboxymethylcellulose. This composite approach leverages the complementary strengths of each material: PTFE provides chemical stability and oxidation resistance, while the elastomers provide mechanical flexibility and adhesion, and CMC provides binding capability. The synergistic combination resolves the contradiction by achieving both cost-effectiveness and mechanical strength through material composition rather than relying on expensive three-dimensional supports.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent specifies precise compositional parameters for the binder system: PTFE content of 0.1-5% by mass, elastomer content of 0.1-3% by mass, and carboxymethylcellulose content of 0.1-5% by mass. By optimizing these parameter ranges, the invention achieves the necessary mechanical strength and adhesion properties for two-dimensional supports, enabling cost reduction without sacrificing performance. The parameter optimization allows the electrode to maintain integrity on flat substrates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If conventional binders like PTFE are used to ensure chemical stability, then chemical stability is improved, but adhesion and mechanical strength deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechemical stabilityVSAvoidadhesion
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a multi-component binder system where PTFE (0.1-5% by mass) provides the necessary chemical stability and oxidation resistance, while elastomers (0.1-3% by mass of EVA or acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene copolymer) provide mechanical flexibility and adhesion, and carboxymethylcellulose (0.1-5% by mass) provides binding capability. This composite approach resolves the contradiction by distributing functional requirements across multiple materials rather than relying on a single binder.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The binder system exhibits local quality differentiation where each component performs its specialized function: PTFE molecules provide chemical inertness and oxidation resistance in the electrochemical environment, while the elastomer phases provide mechanical compliance and adhesion to the substrate, and CMC provides cohesive binding. This functional differentiation within the binder system allows simultaneous achievement of chemical stability and mechanical adhesion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Strength

If EVA is used as binder to improve mechanical strength, then mechanical strength is improved, but self-discharge increases due to particle migration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical strengthVSAvoidself-discharge
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines EVA or acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene copolymer (0.1-3% by mass) with PTFE (0.1-5% by mass) and carboxymethylcellulose (0.1-5% by mass) to create a composite binder system. The PTFE component forms a stable network that prevents particle migration and micro-short circuits, while the elastomer provides mechanical strength. This composite structure resolves the contradiction by using PTFE to counteract the particle migration issue while retaining the mechanical benefits of the elastomer.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The PTFE and carboxnymethylcellulose components act as intermediary materials that stabilize the electrode structure and prevent direct contact between active material particles and the separator. The PTFE forms a protective matrix around the active material, while CMC provides additional binding, together preventing the particle migration that would otherwise occur with EVA alone, thus reducing self-discharge while maintaining mechanical strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Reliability

If PTFE is used to prevent particle migration, then particle migration is reduced, but adhesion and mechanical strength are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparticle migration preventionVSAvoidmechanical strength
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a composite binder system where PTFE (0.1-5% by mass) provides particle migration prevention through its stable network structure, while elastomers (0.1-3% by mass of EVA or acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene copolymer) provide mechanical flexibility and adhesion, and carboxymethylcellulose (0.1-5% by mass) provides binding capability. The synergistic combination allows the electrode to simultaneously achieve particle stabilization and mechanical strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The binder system exhibits functional differentiation where PTFE molecules form a stable protective matrix that prevents particle migration, while the elastomer phases provide mechanical compliance and adhesion to the substrate, and CMC provides cohesive binding. This local quality differentiation within the binder system allows simultaneous achievement of particle migration prevention and mechanical strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

5Duration of action of moving object

If permanent charging current is applied at high temperature to extend usage, then usage duration is extended, but binder oxidation accelerates and lifespan degrades

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveusage durationVSAvoidlifespan
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a composite binder system where PTFE (0.1-5% by mass) provides exceptional oxidation resistance and chemical stability even under permanent charging conditions at elevated temperatures, while elastomers (0.1-3% by mass) provide mechanical flexibility, and carboxymethylcellulose (0.1-5% by mass) provides binding capability. The PTFE component specifically counteracts the oxidation issue, allowing extended usage without proportional lifespan degradation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent specifies optimized compositional parameters including PTFE content of 0.1-5% by mass, elastomer content of 0.1-3% by mass, and carboxymethylcellulose content of 0.1-5% by mass. These parameter optimizations ensure the binder system maintains chemical stability and mechanical integrity under permanent charging conditions at temperatures up to 40°C or higher, allowing extended usage duration without proportional lifespan reduction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The proposed electrode configuration improves mechanical strength and reduces self-discharge, maintaining the lifespan of alkaline accumulators under high temperature and permanent charging conditions, comparable to conventional designs.

Implementation Method 1

Its role in the electrode is therefore essential. It must have adhesion properties with respect to the active material and the metal support

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdhesion: Adhesive

Implementation Method 2

The binder must also have sufficient chemical stability with respect to the electrolyte which is strongly basic, and be resistant to electrochemical oxidation due to the oxidizing potential of the positive electrode

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOxidation resistance: Oxidation

Implementation Method 3

PTFE has the property of forming a network of interconnected filaments which is very effective in preventing the migration of positive particles towards the separator

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhysical containment: Physical Containment

Implementation Method 4

a paste comprising an electrochemically active material based on nickel hydroxide

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrochemical reaction: Redox Reactions

Data Source

PatentEP2811553B1Plastic-coated electrode for alkaline storage battery
Publication Date: 2016.03.09 SAFT GRP SA
  • EP2811553B1 patent drawingFigure 1

AI summary

A non-sintered positive electrode for an alkaline battery, comprising: - a current-conducting metallic support with a thickness less than or equal to 150 microns and - a paste comprising an electrochemically active material based on nickel hydroxide and a binder; the binder comprising: A) at least one copolymer of tetrafluoroethylene and propylene in a mass percentage 'a' relative to the mass of paste such as 0.5% <a<4% ; B) au moins un polymère fluoré autre qu'un copolymère de tétrafluoroéthylène et de propylène, en un pourcentage massique 'b' par rapport à la masse de pâte tel que 0,6%<b<4%; C) au moins un polymère cellulosique et/ou un polymère de l'acide acrylique, en un pourcentage massique 'c' par rapport à la masse de pâte tel que 0,1%<c<0,9% et 1,2%<a+b+c<6%.