Alkylene Oxide Purification via Ambient Butyllithium Reaction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for purifying alkylene oxides are hazardous due to the use of reactive drying agents that can initiate runaway polymerization reactions, requiring strict temperature control and posing safety risks, especially when attempting to purify high molecular weight block copolymers.

Innovation Solution

The method involves using a non-polar solvent with a boiling point higher than 65°C and a purifying agent like butyllithium at ambient temperature, where impurities react readily while the alkylene oxide either does not polymerize or polymerizes very slowly, allowing for safe purification without cooling and reducing the risk of explosions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If reactive drying agents are used to purify alkylene oxides, then purification effectiveness is improved, but safety deteriorates due to runaway polymerization reactions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepurification effectivenessVSAvoidsafety risk from runaway polymerization
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

A high-boiling-point solvent acts as an intermediary medium to dissolve the alkylene oxide and reactive drying agent, creating a controlled environment where the drying agent can function without causing runaway polymerization. The solvent moderates the reaction between the drying agent and alkylene oxide, allowing effective purification while preventing harmful polymerization reactions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the temperature parameter by conducting the purification at elevated temperatures (above the boiling point of the alkylene oxide monomer) rather than at low temperatures. This parameter change prevents polymerization by maintaining the system above the polymerization ceiling temperature, while still allowing the drying agent to effectively remove water and other impurities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-affected harmful factors

If temperature control is strict to prevent polymerization, then safety is improved, but process complexity and cost increase due to cooling requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety from polymerizationVSAvoidcooling system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of cooling the system to prevent polymerization (the conventional approach), the invention inverts the strategy by heating the system to temperatures above the monomer's boiling point. This inversion eliminates the need for complex cooling systems while preventing polymerization through thermal energy that keeps the system above the polymerization ceiling temperature.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If cooling is used to control polymerization temperature, then safety is improved, but energy consumption increases and safety risk from cooling failure increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety from polymerizationVSAvoidenergy consumption for cooling
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The invention converts the potentially harmful effect of thermal energy into a beneficial control mechanism. By maintaining the system at temperatures above the monomer's boiling point, the thermal energy that could potentially cause polymerization is instead harnessed to prevent it. The high temperature serves as a protective barrier against polymerization while eliminating the need for active cooling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables safe and efficient purification of alkylene oxides at ambient temperatures, minimizing polymerization and increasing yield, as well as eliminating the need for costly cooling, thereby enhancing process safety and efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

impurities react readily with the purifying agent

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical reaction: Chemical Bonding

Implementation Method 2

in a solution of a non-polar solvent that has a boiling point higher than 65°C and a purifying agent

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSolvation: Solvation

Implementation Method 3

the alkylene oxide either polymerizes very slowly or does not polymerize at all

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPolymerization: Photopolymerisation

Implementation Method 4

The low-boiling alkylene oxide monomer is then easily distilled out of the high-boiling point solvent

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDistillation: Distillation

Data Source

PatentEP2531266B1Ambient temperature purification of alkylene oxides
Publication Date: 2019.06.12 SEEO INC
  • EP2531266B1 patent drawingFigure 1

AI summary

A new purification technique for alkylene oxides is described. The technique is safer than previously reported methods and does not require cooling of the purification vessel. In a solution of a high-boiling solvent and butyllithium, an alkylene oxide is added and allowed to react at ambient temperature. The impurities readily react with the butyllithium while the alkylene oxide does not. The low-boiling alkylene oxide is then easily distilled out of the high-boiling solvent as a pure material ready for use in controlled polymerization reactions.